The Effect of Topography and Irrigation on Soil Development and Clay Mineral Diversity of Khuzestan's Gypsic Soils

Y. Abdoli, S. Jafari
{"title":"The Effect of Topography and Irrigation on Soil Development and Clay Mineral Diversity of Khuzestan's Gypsic Soils","authors":"Y. Abdoli, S. Jafari","doi":"10.29252/jstnar.22.1.387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was done to evaluate the effect of topography, water table, and irrigation on gypsc soil development and clay mineral diversity in Ram-Hormuz Plain, Khuzestan Province. To localize, 10 profiles in this region that covered all purpose irrigation and topography situation were described. The results showed that the soils could be classified in Entisols, Inceptisols and Aridisols orders. All soil epipedons were ochric and subsurface horizons were cambic, gypsic, and salic. The salic horizons were formed under a low water table. The XRD results showed that smectite, kaolinite, illite, chlorite, palygorskite, vermiculite and sepiolite were the dominant minerals, respectively. Kaolinite and illite were inherited from the parent material, but chlorite was the result of both inheritance and transformation of other clay minerals except uncultivated or non-irrigated soils. Sepiolite was decreased in gypsic horizons, but palygorskite was increased in these horizons. Sepiolite was raised with increasing the depth under the good drainage class; this could be related to neoformation, but it was decreased with depth under the weak drainage class. These results could be due to the instability of this mineral in high moisture and its low Mg activity. There was also a negative correlation correlation between Palygorskite and smectite; this was such that most palygorskite was observed in the surface horizons, but smectite was in the subsurface. Smectite was the dominant clay mineral in the studied soils; it was formed from the weathering of other minerals as well as from neoformed ones in the lowlands. Vermiculite was formed in these soils due to k depletion by leaching or plant absorption. This happened in the illite to smectite transformation process. Therefore, topography and irrigation could be regarded as the main factors putting these soils in high category; also, clay mineral assemblage was different under this situation in these soils.","PeriodicalId":151496,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water and Soil Science","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water and Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/jstnar.22.1.387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study was done to evaluate the effect of topography, water table, and irrigation on gypsc soil development and clay mineral diversity in Ram-Hormuz Plain, Khuzestan Province. To localize, 10 profiles in this region that covered all purpose irrigation and topography situation were described. The results showed that the soils could be classified in Entisols, Inceptisols and Aridisols orders. All soil epipedons were ochric and subsurface horizons were cambic, gypsic, and salic. The salic horizons were formed under a low water table. The XRD results showed that smectite, kaolinite, illite, chlorite, palygorskite, vermiculite and sepiolite were the dominant minerals, respectively. Kaolinite and illite were inherited from the parent material, but chlorite was the result of both inheritance and transformation of other clay minerals except uncultivated or non-irrigated soils. Sepiolite was decreased in gypsic horizons, but palygorskite was increased in these horizons. Sepiolite was raised with increasing the depth under the good drainage class; this could be related to neoformation, but it was decreased with depth under the weak drainage class. These results could be due to the instability of this mineral in high moisture and its low Mg activity. There was also a negative correlation correlation between Palygorskite and smectite; this was such that most palygorskite was observed in the surface horizons, but smectite was in the subsurface. Smectite was the dominant clay mineral in the studied soils; it was formed from the weathering of other minerals as well as from neoformed ones in the lowlands. Vermiculite was formed in these soils due to k depletion by leaching or plant absorption. This happened in the illite to smectite transformation process. Therefore, topography and irrigation could be regarded as the main factors putting these soils in high category; also, clay mineral assemblage was different under this situation in these soils.
地形和灌溉对胡齐斯坦吉普赛土壤发育和粘土矿物多样性的影响
研究了地形、地下水位和灌溉对胡齐斯坦省拉姆-霍尔木兹平原石膏土发育和粘土矿物多样性的影响。为了定位,本文描述了该地区10条覆盖所有用途灌溉和地形情况的剖面图。结果表明,该土壤可分为完整土目、初始土目和干旱区土目。土壤表层均为赭石层,地下层为形成层、泥质层和盐质层。盐层是在低地下水位下形成的。XRD结果表明,主要矿物分别为蒙脱石、高岭石、伊利石、绿泥石、坡缕石、蛭石和海泡石。高岭石和伊利石是由母质遗传而来,而绿泥石则是除未开垦或未灌溉土壤外其他黏土矿物遗传和转化的结果。海泡石在泥质层中减少,而坡缕石在泥质层中增加。良好排水等级下,海泡石随深度增加而升高;这可能与新生物有关,但在弱排水类型下随深度增加而减小。这些结果可能是由于这种矿物在高湿度下的不稳定性和它的低镁活性。坡缕石与蒙脱石呈负相关;这就是为什么大多数的坡缕石是在地表被观察到的,而蒙脱石是在地下。蒙脱石是研究土壤中主要的粘土矿物;它是由其他矿物的风化作用以及低地新形成的矿物形成的。蛭石在这些土壤中形成是由于沥滤或植物吸收钾的耗竭。这发生在伊利石到蒙脱石的转化过程中。因此,地形和灌溉是使这些土壤处于高等级的主要因素;在这种情况下,这些土壤中的粘土矿物组合也不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信