[Comparative study on the biological properties of plastics for temporary crowns and bridges].

Stomatologie der DDR Pub Date : 1990-03-01
E Lenz, V Lang
{"title":"[Comparative study on the biological properties of plastics for temporary crowns and bridges].","authors":"E Lenz,&nbsp;V Lang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Six different plastic materials for temporary crowns and bridges were tested comparatively concerning their biological properties. To this the temperature in the pulp cavity was measured in vitro while making temporary crowns. Also the cytotoxicity was determined by the hemolysis-test. The results obtained showed that there is no thermal irritation of the pulp if the temporary plastic material is applied in an alginate impression as usual in practice. Cytotoxicity of the hardened plastics was not provable. Nevertheless tissue irritation can not be justified when using polymethacrylates and epimine-resin.</p>","PeriodicalId":76559,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologie der DDR","volume":"40 3","pages":"100-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologie der DDR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Six different plastic materials for temporary crowns and bridges were tested comparatively concerning their biological properties. To this the temperature in the pulp cavity was measured in vitro while making temporary crowns. Also the cytotoxicity was determined by the hemolysis-test. The results obtained showed that there is no thermal irritation of the pulp if the temporary plastic material is applied in an alginate impression as usual in practice. Cytotoxicity of the hardened plastics was not provable. Nevertheless tissue irritation can not be justified when using polymethacrylates and epimine-resin.

[临时冠与桥用塑料生物性能的比较研究]。
对6种不同塑料临时冠桥材料的生物学性能进行了比较试验。为此,在体外制作临时牙冠时测量牙髓腔内的温度。用溶血试验测定细胞毒性。结果表明,如果在实践中采用海藻酸盐压印中使用临时塑料材料,则不会对纸浆产生热刺激。硬化塑料的细胞毒性尚未得到证实。然而,当使用聚甲基丙烯酸酯和亚胺树脂时,组织刺激是不合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信