Feature selection for ranking using boosted trees

Feng Pan, Tim Converse, David Ahn, F. Salvetti, Gianluca Donato
{"title":"Feature selection for ranking using boosted trees","authors":"Feng Pan, Tim Converse, David Ahn, F. Salvetti, Gianluca Donato","doi":"10.1145/1645953.1646292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern search engines have to be fast to satisfy users, so there are hard back-end latency requirements. The set of features useful for search ranking functions, though, continues to grow, making feature computation a latency bottleneck. As a result, not all available features can be used for ranking, and in fact, much of the time, only a small percentage of these features can be used. Thus, it is crucial to have a feature selection mechanism that can find a subset of features that both meets latency requirements and achieves high relevance. To this end, we explore different feature selection methods using boosted regression trees, including both greedy approaches (selecting the features with highest relative importance as computed by boosted trees; discounting importance by feature similarity and a randomized approach. We evaluate and compare these approaches using data from a commercial search engine. The experimental results show that the proposed randomized feature selection with feature-importance-based backward elimination outperforms greedy approaches and achieves a comparable relevance with 30 features to a full-feature model trained with 419 features and the same modeling parameters.","PeriodicalId":286251,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1645953.1646292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

Modern search engines have to be fast to satisfy users, so there are hard back-end latency requirements. The set of features useful for search ranking functions, though, continues to grow, making feature computation a latency bottleneck. As a result, not all available features can be used for ranking, and in fact, much of the time, only a small percentage of these features can be used. Thus, it is crucial to have a feature selection mechanism that can find a subset of features that both meets latency requirements and achieves high relevance. To this end, we explore different feature selection methods using boosted regression trees, including both greedy approaches (selecting the features with highest relative importance as computed by boosted trees; discounting importance by feature similarity and a randomized approach. We evaluate and compare these approaches using data from a commercial search engine. The experimental results show that the proposed randomized feature selection with feature-importance-based backward elimination outperforms greedy approaches and achieves a comparable relevance with 30 features to a full-feature model trained with 419 features and the same modeling parameters.
使用增强树进行特征选择
现代搜索引擎必须快速满足用户,因此存在硬后端延迟需求。然而,对搜索排序函数有用的特性集在不断增长,使特征计算成为延迟瓶颈。因此,并不是所有可用的功能都可以用于排名,事实上,很多时候,这些功能中只有一小部分可以使用。因此,拥有一种能够找到既满足延迟需求又实现高相关性的特征子集的特征选择机制是至关重要的。为此,我们探索了使用增强回归树的不同特征选择方法,包括两种贪婪方法(选择由增强树计算的相对重要性最高的特征;通过特征相似度和随机化方法来贴现重要性。我们使用来自商业搜索引擎的数据来评估和比较这些方法。实验结果表明,基于特征重要度的后向消除随机特征选择方法优于贪婪方法,30个特征与419个相同建模参数的全特征模型的相关性相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信