Product Decoys: A Supply Chain Perspective

Quan Zheng, X. Pan, A. Vakharia
{"title":"Product Decoys: A Supply Chain Perspective","authors":"Quan Zheng, X. Pan, A. Vakharia","doi":"10.1111/POMS.13391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional wisdom suggests that by including a decoy product in the choice set for consumers, a firm can drive consumers to select more profitable non-decoy products. Explanations offered to explain such outcomes are rooted in the psychology of consumer behavior. A scan of retail practice, however, indicates that decoys might also be included in a product assortment for economic reasons. For example, products with very low sales potential are often included in offerings by bricks-and-mortar and online retailers. This leads us to investigate and offer an alternative supply side explanation for the presence of decoy products in a supply chain. \n \nMore specifically, we show that in a distribution channel with multiple asymmetric manufacturers and a single retailer, there exists the possibility of an equilibrium which includes a decoy product. Such an equilibrium is characterized by the retailer stocking positive quantities of products from a subset of low-cost manufacturers (active manufacturers) and negligible or even zero stock of a decoy product sourced from a higher-cost manufacturer. The retailer includes a decoy product in the assortment since it helps to obtain better contractual terms from the active manufacturers. Recognizing this, upstream active manufacturers not only compete for market share but are induced to cooperate (in setting wholesale prices) so as to ensure that the manufacturer of the decoy product is driven out of the market. We also find that the degree of product substitutability moderates which manufacturer's product is a decoy. Our findings provide theoretical support for industry practice as well as implications for retail assortment decisions.","PeriodicalId":200007,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Statistical Decision Theory; Operations Research (Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Statistical Decision Theory; Operations Research (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/POMS.13391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Conventional wisdom suggests that by including a decoy product in the choice set for consumers, a firm can drive consumers to select more profitable non-decoy products. Explanations offered to explain such outcomes are rooted in the psychology of consumer behavior. A scan of retail practice, however, indicates that decoys might also be included in a product assortment for economic reasons. For example, products with very low sales potential are often included in offerings by bricks-and-mortar and online retailers. This leads us to investigate and offer an alternative supply side explanation for the presence of decoy products in a supply chain. More specifically, we show that in a distribution channel with multiple asymmetric manufacturers and a single retailer, there exists the possibility of an equilibrium which includes a decoy product. Such an equilibrium is characterized by the retailer stocking positive quantities of products from a subset of low-cost manufacturers (active manufacturers) and negligible or even zero stock of a decoy product sourced from a higher-cost manufacturer. The retailer includes a decoy product in the assortment since it helps to obtain better contractual terms from the active manufacturers. Recognizing this, upstream active manufacturers not only compete for market share but are induced to cooperate (in setting wholesale prices) so as to ensure that the manufacturer of the decoy product is driven out of the market. We also find that the degree of product substitutability moderates which manufacturer's product is a decoy. Our findings provide theoretical support for industry practice as well as implications for retail assortment decisions.
产品诱饵:供应链视角
传统观点认为,通过在消费者的选择集中包含一个诱饵产品,企业可以促使消费者选择更有利可图的非诱饵产品。为解释这种结果而提供的解释根植于消费者行为心理学。然而,对零售实践的扫描表明,出于经济原因,诱饵也可能包含在产品分类中。例如,销售潜力非常低的产品通常被实体店和网上零售商纳入销售范围。这导致我们对供应链中存在的诱饵产品进行调查并提供另一种供应侧解释。更具体地说,我们证明了在具有多个非对称制造商和单个零售商的分销渠道中,存在包含诱饵产品的均衡可能性。这种均衡的特点是,零售商从低成本制造商(活跃制造商)的子集中库存正数量的产品,而来自高成本制造商的诱饵产品的库存可以忽略不计,甚至为零。零售商在分类中包括一个诱饵产品,因为它有助于从活跃的制造商那里获得更好的合同条款。认识到这一点,上游活跃的制造商不仅竞争市场份额,而且被诱导合作(制定批发价格),以确保诱饵产品的制造商被赶出市场。我们还发现,产品可替代性的程度调节制造商的产品是一个诱饵。我们的研究结果为行业实践提供了理论支持,也为零售分类决策提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信