Comparison Study on Asset Pricing Model in Chinese Stock Market: CAPM and Fama-French Model

Tianshu Liu, Jae-Seung Baek
{"title":"Comparison Study on Asset Pricing Model in Chinese Stock Market: CAPM and Fama-French Model","authors":"Tianshu Liu, Jae-Seung Baek","doi":"10.21102/GRAF.2019.03.101.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Harry Markowitz (1959) develops a mean-variance model for efficient portfolio management. Based on this model, Sharpe (1964), Lintner (1965) and Black (1972) build the CAPM. Merton (1973) then generalizes the CAPM and proposes the ICAPM. Afterwards, Fama and French (1996) take the idea of Ross’s (1976) arbitrage pricing theory and construct a three-factor model. The Fama-French three-factor model explains covariation in average returns around the capital market in the world. However, empirical findings are not in favour of the use of the CAPM that may arise from the features of Chinese capital market which are state-owned system and non-capitalization. The purpose of this research is to explore the explanatory power of asset pricing models in regards to investor behaviour in Chinese stock market. The findings of this study are that the Fama-French three-factor model better explains time-series variation in stock returns than the CAPM. Size effect exists in Shanghai and China (Shanghai and Shenzhen) stock market. However, value effect is found only in Shanghai stock market. Empirical results also show that, in Shanghai stock market, firms with low E/P ratios tend to have higher returns and firms with higher E/P ratios tend to have lower returns. Robustness tests show that the Fama-French three-factor model is better than CAPM to explain stock return variation in Chinese stock market.","PeriodicalId":179330,"journal":{"name":"Global Review of Accounting and Finance","volume":"585 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Review of Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21102/GRAF.2019.03.101.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Harry Markowitz (1959) develops a mean-variance model for efficient portfolio management. Based on this model, Sharpe (1964), Lintner (1965) and Black (1972) build the CAPM. Merton (1973) then generalizes the CAPM and proposes the ICAPM. Afterwards, Fama and French (1996) take the idea of Ross’s (1976) arbitrage pricing theory and construct a three-factor model. The Fama-French three-factor model explains covariation in average returns around the capital market in the world. However, empirical findings are not in favour of the use of the CAPM that may arise from the features of Chinese capital market which are state-owned system and non-capitalization. The purpose of this research is to explore the explanatory power of asset pricing models in regards to investor behaviour in Chinese stock market. The findings of this study are that the Fama-French three-factor model better explains time-series variation in stock returns than the CAPM. Size effect exists in Shanghai and China (Shanghai and Shenzhen) stock market. However, value effect is found only in Shanghai stock market. Empirical results also show that, in Shanghai stock market, firms with low E/P ratios tend to have higher returns and firms with higher E/P ratios tend to have lower returns. Robustness tests show that the Fama-French three-factor model is better than CAPM to explain stock return variation in Chinese stock market.
中国股票市场资产定价模型的比较研究:CAPM与Fama-French模型
Harry Markowitz(1959)为有效的投资组合管理建立了均值-方差模型。Sharpe(1964)、Lintner(1965)和Black(1972)在此模型的基础上建立了CAPM。默顿(1973)对CAPM进行了推广,提出了ICAPM。之后,Fama和French(1996)借鉴Ross(1976)的套利定价理论,构建了一个三因素模型。Fama-French三因素模型解释了全球资本市场平均收益的协变。然而,由于中国资本市场的国有体制和非资本化特征,实证结果并不支持使用CAPM。本研究的目的是探讨资产定价模型对中国股市投资者行为的解释力。本研究发现Fama-French三因子模型比CAPM更能解释股票收益的时间序列变化。上海和中国(沪深)股市都存在规模效应。但价值效应只存在于上海股市。实证结果还表明,在上海股市中,市盈率较低的公司往往收益较高,市盈率较高的公司往往收益较低。稳健性检验表明,Fama-French三因素模型比CAPM模型更能解释中国股票市场的收益变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信