Sources of Increasing Differential Mortality Among the Aged by Socioeconomic Status

B. Bosworth, Gary T. Burtless, Kan Zhang
{"title":"Sources of Increasing Differential Mortality Among the Aged by Socioeconomic Status","authors":"B. Bosworth, Gary T. Burtless, Kan Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2622120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to explore the extent and causes of widening differences in life expectancy by socioeconomic status (SES) for older persons. We construct alternative measures of SES using educational attainment and average (career) earnings in the prime working ages of 41-50. We also use information on causes of death, health status and various behavioral indicators (smoking, drinking, and obesity) that are believed to be predictors of premature death in an effort to explain the causes of the growing disparities in life expectancy between people of high and low SES. The paper finds that: - There is strong statistical evidence in the HRS of a growing inequality of mortality risk by SES among more recent birth cohorts compared with cohorts born before 1930. - Both educational attainment and career earnings as constructed from Social Security records are equally useful indicators of SES, although the distinction in mortality risk by education is greatest for those with and without a college degree. - There has been a significant decline in the risk of dying from cancer or heart conditions for older Americans in the top half of the income distribution, but we find no such reduction of mortality risk in the bottom half of the distribution. - The inclusion of the behavioral variables and health status result in substantial improvement in the predictions of mortality, but they do not identify the sources of the increase in differential mortality. The policy implications of the findings are: - Indexing the retirement age to increases in average life expectancy to stabilize OASDI finances may have unintended distributional consequences, because most mortality gains have been concentrated among workers in the top half of the earnings distribution. - The fact that we cannot identify the sources of the increase in differential mortality contributes to uncertainty about the distributional effects of increases in the retirement age in future years.","PeriodicalId":177602,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Delivery & Financing eJournal","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Delivery & Financing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2622120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

This paper uses data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to explore the extent and causes of widening differences in life expectancy by socioeconomic status (SES) for older persons. We construct alternative measures of SES using educational attainment and average (career) earnings in the prime working ages of 41-50. We also use information on causes of death, health status and various behavioral indicators (smoking, drinking, and obesity) that are believed to be predictors of premature death in an effort to explain the causes of the growing disparities in life expectancy between people of high and low SES. The paper finds that: - There is strong statistical evidence in the HRS of a growing inequality of mortality risk by SES among more recent birth cohorts compared with cohorts born before 1930. - Both educational attainment and career earnings as constructed from Social Security records are equally useful indicators of SES, although the distinction in mortality risk by education is greatest for those with and without a college degree. - There has been a significant decline in the risk of dying from cancer or heart conditions for older Americans in the top half of the income distribution, but we find no such reduction of mortality risk in the bottom half of the distribution. - The inclusion of the behavioral variables and health status result in substantial improvement in the predictions of mortality, but they do not identify the sources of the increase in differential mortality. The policy implications of the findings are: - Indexing the retirement age to increases in average life expectancy to stabilize OASDI finances may have unintended distributional consequences, because most mortality gains have been concentrated among workers in the top half of the earnings distribution. - The fact that we cannot identify the sources of the increase in differential mortality contributes to uncertainty about the distributional effects of increases in the retirement age in future years.
不同社会经济地位老年人死亡率差异增加的原因
本文使用健康与退休研究(HRS)的数据来探讨老年人社会经济地位(SES)对预期寿命差异扩大的程度和原因。我们使用教育程度和41-50岁黄金工作年龄的平均(职业)收入构建了社会经济地位的替代测量方法。我们还使用死亡原因、健康状况和各种行为指标(吸烟、饮酒和肥胖)的信息,这些被认为是过早死亡的预测因素,以努力解释高社会经济地位和低社会经济地位人群之间预期寿命差距越来越大的原因。该论文发现:-在HRS中有强有力的统计证据表明,与1930年之前出生的队列相比,最近出生的队列中SES死亡风险的不平等程度越来越大。-根据社会保障记录构建的教育程度和职业收入同样是社会经济地位的有用指标,尽管教育在死亡率风险方面的差异在有大学学位和没有大学学位的人中最大。在收入分配的上半部分,美国老年人死于癌症或心脏病的风险显著下降,但在收入分配的下半部分,我们发现死亡风险没有下降。-纳入行为变量和健康状况大大改善了对死亡率的预测,但它们没有确定差异死亡率增加的来源。研究结果的政策含义是:-将退休年龄与平均预期寿命的增长挂钩,以稳定OASDI的财务状况,可能会产生意想不到的分配后果,因为大多数死亡率的增长集中在收入分配的上半部分的工人身上。-我们无法确定差异死亡率增加的来源,这一事实使未来几年退休年龄提高对分配的影响变得不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信