On Measuring RPKI Relying Parties

J. Kristoff, R. Bush, Chris Kanich, G. Michaelson, A. Phokeer, T. Schmidt, Matthias Wählisch
{"title":"On Measuring RPKI Relying Parties","authors":"J. Kristoff, R. Bush, Chris Kanich, G. Michaelson, A. Phokeer, T. Schmidt, Matthias Wählisch","doi":"10.1145/3419394.3423622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we introduce a framework to observe RPKI relying parties (i.e., those that fetch RPKI data from the distributed repository) and present insights into this ecosystem for the first time. Our longitudinal study of data gathered from three RPKI certification authorities (AFRINIC, APNIC, and our own CA) identifies different deployment models of relying parties and (surprisingly) prevalent inconsistent fetching behavior that affects Internet routing robustness. Our results reveal nearly 90% of relying parties are unable to connect to delegated publication points under certain conditions, which leads to erroneous invalidation of IP prefixes and likely widespread loss of network reachability.","PeriodicalId":255324,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3419394.3423622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a framework to observe RPKI relying parties (i.e., those that fetch RPKI data from the distributed repository) and present insights into this ecosystem for the first time. Our longitudinal study of data gathered from three RPKI certification authorities (AFRINIC, APNIC, and our own CA) identifies different deployment models of relying parties and (surprisingly) prevalent inconsistent fetching behavior that affects Internet routing robustness. Our results reveal nearly 90% of relying parties are unable to connect to delegated publication points under certain conditions, which leads to erroneous invalidation of IP prefixes and likely widespread loss of network reachability.
论RPKI依赖方的测度
在本文中,我们引入了一个框架来观察RPKI依赖方(即那些从分布式存储库获取RPKI数据的方),并首次提出了对这个生态系统的见解。我们对从三个RPKI认证机构(AFRINIC、APNIC和我们自己的CA)收集的数据进行了纵向研究,确定了依赖方的不同部署模型,以及(令人惊讶的)普遍存在的影响Internet路由健壮性的不一致抓取行为。我们的研究结果显示,在某些条件下,近90%的依赖方无法连接到委托的发布点,这导致IP前缀错误失效,并可能导致网络可达性的广泛损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信