Comparison of Three Different Epidural Solutions in Cardiac Surgery for Stress Protection

Olivier Jean-François, Prieto Ignatio, Basile Fadi, H. Thomas
{"title":"Comparison of Three Different Epidural Solutions in Cardiac Surgery for Stress Protection","authors":"Olivier Jean-François, Prieto Ignatio, Basile Fadi, H. Thomas","doi":"10.2174/1874321800903010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Different solutions are possible for thoracic epidural analgesia in cardiac surgery. So far, local an- esthetics alone or in combination with either clonidine or opioids have been used. Aims: To determine the stress protection provided by different epidural solutions throughout cardiac surgery. Study Design: A randomized, prospective, double blind study in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB), randomized in three different groups. Thoracic epidural analgesia was installed more than 1 h before application of heparin at levels of T2 to T4; analgesia was provided by 8 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% 15 min prior to surgery and extubation, and 10 ml/h during and up to 72 h after surgery using one of the following regimens: bupivacaine 0.125% solely, bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 3 � g/mL or bupivacaine 0.125% with clonidine 0.6 � g/mL. Patients were block- randomized for one of the three treatments. Cortisol and glucose values were determined before surgery, at extubation and 1h and 3h after surgery. Pain scores were assessed up to 48 h after surgery. Hemodynamic stability was also recorded in form of heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Multi-comparison ANOVA and Chi-square test were used to compare the data, presented as mean (SD) or median (25 th and 75 th percentile), P < 0.05. Study Setting: A cardiac surgery unit at a tertiary university hospital. Participants: Forty-two patients undergoing OPCAB were enrolled. Main Results: All patient data as well hemodynamic stability were not different between the three groups. All patients were successfully extubated in theatre immediately after surgery. Pain control was good and not significantly different be- tween the groups. Mean glucose concentrations ± SD before surgery and (significantly higher) 3h after surgery were 5.4 ± 1.0 mmol l -1 and 8.4 ± 1.6 mmol l -1 for bupivacaine alone, 5.2 ± 0.5 mmol l -1 and 8.5 ± 2.2 mmol l -1 for bupivacaine plus fentanyl and 5.5 ± 1.6 mmol l -1 and 9.5 ± 2.1mmol l -1 for bupivacaine and clonidine, respectively. The mean cortisol val- ues ± SD in the pre-operative period and 3h after surgery were 413 ± 162 nmol l -1 and 562 ± 173 nmol l -1 for bupivacaine alone, 393 ± 107 nmol l -1 and 581 ± 265 nmol l -1 for bupivacaine and fentanyl and 409 ± 159 nmol l -1 and 570 ± 160 nmol l -1 for bupivacaine and clonidine, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: We conclude that short-term stress protection with TEA is equally effective with solely bupivacaine, bupivacaine with fentanyl or clonidine.","PeriodicalId":272376,"journal":{"name":"The Open Anesthesiology Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Anesthesiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874321800903010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Different solutions are possible for thoracic epidural analgesia in cardiac surgery. So far, local an- esthetics alone or in combination with either clonidine or opioids have been used. Aims: To determine the stress protection provided by different epidural solutions throughout cardiac surgery. Study Design: A randomized, prospective, double blind study in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB), randomized in three different groups. Thoracic epidural analgesia was installed more than 1 h before application of heparin at levels of T2 to T4; analgesia was provided by 8 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% 15 min prior to surgery and extubation, and 10 ml/h during and up to 72 h after surgery using one of the following regimens: bupivacaine 0.125% solely, bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 3 � g/mL or bupivacaine 0.125% with clonidine 0.6 � g/mL. Patients were block- randomized for one of the three treatments. Cortisol and glucose values were determined before surgery, at extubation and 1h and 3h after surgery. Pain scores were assessed up to 48 h after surgery. Hemodynamic stability was also recorded in form of heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Multi-comparison ANOVA and Chi-square test were used to compare the data, presented as mean (SD) or median (25 th and 75 th percentile), P < 0.05. Study Setting: A cardiac surgery unit at a tertiary university hospital. Participants: Forty-two patients undergoing OPCAB were enrolled. Main Results: All patient data as well hemodynamic stability were not different between the three groups. All patients were successfully extubated in theatre immediately after surgery. Pain control was good and not significantly different be- tween the groups. Mean glucose concentrations ± SD before surgery and (significantly higher) 3h after surgery were 5.4 ± 1.0 mmol l -1 and 8.4 ± 1.6 mmol l -1 for bupivacaine alone, 5.2 ± 0.5 mmol l -1 and 8.5 ± 2.2 mmol l -1 for bupivacaine plus fentanyl and 5.5 ± 1.6 mmol l -1 and 9.5 ± 2.1mmol l -1 for bupivacaine and clonidine, respectively. The mean cortisol val- ues ± SD in the pre-operative period and 3h after surgery were 413 ± 162 nmol l -1 and 562 ± 173 nmol l -1 for bupivacaine alone, 393 ± 107 nmol l -1 and 581 ± 265 nmol l -1 for bupivacaine and fentanyl and 409 ± 159 nmol l -1 and 570 ± 160 nmol l -1 for bupivacaine and clonidine, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: We conclude that short-term stress protection with TEA is equally effective with solely bupivacaine, bupivacaine with fentanyl or clonidine.
三种硬膜外溶液在心脏手术中应激保护作用的比较
背景:心脏手术胸椎硬膜外镇痛有不同的解决方案。到目前为止,局部麻醉药单独使用或与可乐定或阿片类药物联合使用。目的:探讨不同硬膜外溶液在心脏手术过程中的应激保护作用。研究设计:一项随机、前瞻性、双盲研究,研究对象为非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)患者,随机分为三组。在T2 ~ T4水平应用肝素前1 h以上安装胸硬膜外镇痛;术前和拔管前15分钟给予8ml 0.25%布比卡因镇痛,术中至术后72小时给予10ml /h,使用以下方案之一:单独给予0.125%布比卡因,0.125%布比卡因与芬太尼3 μ g/ ml或0.125%布比卡因与0.6 μ g/ ml。患者被随机分组接受三种治疗方法中的一种。分别于术前、拔管时及术后1h和3h测定皮质醇和葡萄糖值。术后48小时评估疼痛评分。血流动力学稳定性也以心率、收缩压和舒张压的形式记录。采用多比较方差分析和卡方检验比较资料,以均数(SD)或中位数(25百分位和75百分位)表示,P < 0.05。研究地点:某三级大学附属医院心脏外科。参与者:纳入42例接受OPCAB的患者。主要结果:三组患者资料及血流动力学稳定性无显著差异。所有患者术后立即在手术室成功拔管。疼痛控制良好,组间无显著差异。布比卡因组术前和术后3h平均葡萄糖浓度±SD分别为5.4±1.0 mmol l -1和8.4±1.6 mmol l -1,布比卡因加芬太尼组为5.2±0.5 mmol l -1和8.5±2.2 mmol l -1,布比卡因加可乐定组分别为5.5±1.6 mmol l -1和9.5±2.1mmol l -1。布比卡因组术前和术后3h平均皮质醇值±SD分别为413±162 nmol l- 1和562±173 nmol l- 1,布比卡因和芬太尼组分别为393±107 nmol l- 1和581±265 nmol l- 1,布比卡因和可卡因定组分别为409±159 nmol l- 1和570±160 nmol l- 1。两组之间没有显著差异。结论:我们的结论是,TEA短期应激保护与单独布比卡因、布比卡因与芬太尼或可乐定联合使用同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信