[Epidural conduction anesthesia versus general anesthesia. A critical evaluation of outcome studies using as examples cesarean section and patients with hip fractures].

H A Adams, G Hempelmann
{"title":"[Epidural conduction anesthesia versus general anesthesia. A critical evaluation of outcome studies using as examples cesarean section and patients with hip fractures].","authors":"H A Adams,&nbsp;G Hempelmann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the field of anaesthesiology, outcome studies are undertaken to investigate the influence of different anaesthetic techniques on the intra- and postoperative course of patients in special clinical situations. The design of these studies should follow high methodological standards. In the past, most studies were undertaken in patients during Caesarean section and in the treatment of hip fractures in the elderly. Up to now, results do not clearly indicate the use of certain techniques in concrete clinical situations. Decisions must be made in accordance with clinical aspects, individual experience and in cooperation with the patient and the surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":7813,"journal":{"name":"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin","volume":"25 6","pages":"391-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the field of anaesthesiology, outcome studies are undertaken to investigate the influence of different anaesthetic techniques on the intra- and postoperative course of patients in special clinical situations. The design of these studies should follow high methodological standards. In the past, most studies were undertaken in patients during Caesarean section and in the treatment of hip fractures in the elderly. Up to now, results do not clearly indicate the use of certain techniques in concrete clinical situations. Decisions must be made in accordance with clinical aspects, individual experience and in cooperation with the patient and the surgeon.

硬膜外传导麻醉与全身麻醉。以剖宫产术和髋部骨折患者为例,对结局研究进行批判性评价。
在麻醉学领域,结果研究是为了调查不同麻醉技术对特殊临床情况下患者术中和术后过程的影响。这些研究的设计应遵循较高的方法标准。在过去,大多数研究是在剖腹产患者和老年人髋部骨折的治疗中进行的。到目前为止,结果并没有明确指出某些技术在具体临床情况下的应用。决定必须根据临床方面,个人经验,并与患者和外科医生的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信