Modeling the relationship between utilities and partners

O. Topchiy
{"title":"Modeling the relationship between utilities and partners","authors":"O. Topchiy","doi":"10.31499/2616-5236.2(13).2020.213482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to study the features of modelling the relationship between utilities and partners. Methodology. General scientific methods are used in the research, in particular, generalizations, comparisons – to analyse the views of scientists on modelling the relationship between utilities and partners, indicating the main forms of public-private partnership, the advantages and disadvantages of their use. Results. It is proved that the relationship between the state and business today is extremely strategically important for the state in the formation of sustainable development goals. Building effective relationships in housing and communal services will be a success for effective activities and will satisfy all participants: the state, business and the population. It is proved that in modern conditions, housing and communal services is a complex hierarchical system that combines many separate subsystems and has the characteristics of a spatial economy, i.e. regional structure and scale. The analysis of the legal and regulatory framework shows that there are only three players in the market of housing and communal services: managers, service providers and consumers. Also, there are various opportunities to establish partnerships with most existing stakeholders, including the use of public-private partnerships in housing and communal services. It is investigated that among the widespread variants of private capital raising in the communal sphere the following basic forms are identified: contract for works, contract for enterprise management, lease, concession, privatization. Thus, local public authorities have the opportunity to transfer utilities in concession or lease to private investors. However, this has not become a common practice due to the complexity of their organizational mechanism. Practical meaning. It is proved that the most effective form of public-private partnership for housing and communal services is a concession – the process of granting, in order to meet public needs by an authorized executive body or local government, concluding a contract on a paid and fixed basis, the concessionaire ) management of the concession object, on the terms of property liability by the concessionaire and possible division of business risk. Prospects for further research. The need to study the advantages and disadvantages of other forms of public-private partnership in housing and communal services.","PeriodicalId":296128,"journal":{"name":"Economies' Horizons","volume":"225 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economies' Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31499/2616-5236.2(13).2020.213482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to study the features of modelling the relationship between utilities and partners. Methodology. General scientific methods are used in the research, in particular, generalizations, comparisons – to analyse the views of scientists on modelling the relationship between utilities and partners, indicating the main forms of public-private partnership, the advantages and disadvantages of their use. Results. It is proved that the relationship between the state and business today is extremely strategically important for the state in the formation of sustainable development goals. Building effective relationships in housing and communal services will be a success for effective activities and will satisfy all participants: the state, business and the population. It is proved that in modern conditions, housing and communal services is a complex hierarchical system that combines many separate subsystems and has the characteristics of a spatial economy, i.e. regional structure and scale. The analysis of the legal and regulatory framework shows that there are only three players in the market of housing and communal services: managers, service providers and consumers. Also, there are various opportunities to establish partnerships with most existing stakeholders, including the use of public-private partnerships in housing and communal services. It is investigated that among the widespread variants of private capital raising in the communal sphere the following basic forms are identified: contract for works, contract for enterprise management, lease, concession, privatization. Thus, local public authorities have the opportunity to transfer utilities in concession or lease to private investors. However, this has not become a common practice due to the complexity of their organizational mechanism. Practical meaning. It is proved that the most effective form of public-private partnership for housing and communal services is a concession – the process of granting, in order to meet public needs by an authorized executive body or local government, concluding a contract on a paid and fixed basis, the concessionaire ) management of the concession object, on the terms of property liability by the concessionaire and possible division of business risk. Prospects for further research. The need to study the advantages and disadvantages of other forms of public-private partnership in housing and communal services.
对实用工具和合作伙伴之间的关系进行建模
本文的目的是研究公用事业公司与合作伙伴关系建模的特点。方法。研究中使用了一般的科学方法,特别是概括、比较——分析科学家对公用事业和合作伙伴之间关系建模的观点,指出公私伙伴关系的主要形式、使用它们的优点和缺点。结果。事实证明,当今国家与企业的关系对于国家形成可持续发展目标具有极其重要的战略意义。在住房和公共服务方面建立有效的关系将是有效活动的成功,并将使所有参与者满意:国家、企业和人口。事实证明,在现代条件下,住房和公共服务是一个复杂的层次系统,它结合了许多独立的子系统,具有空间经济的特征,即区域结构和规模。对法律和监管框架的分析表明,住房和公共服务市场只有三个参与者:管理者、服务提供者和消费者。此外,还有各种机会与大多数现有利益攸关方建立伙伴关系,包括在住房和公共服务方面利用公私伙伴关系。研究表明,在公共领域广泛存在的私人资本筹集形式中,确定了以下基本形式:工程合同、企业管理合同、租赁、特许、私有化。因此,地方公共当局有机会以特许权或租赁的方式将公用事业转让给私人投资者。然而,由于其组织机制的复杂性,这并没有成为一种普遍的做法。现实意义。事实证明,在住房和公共服务方面,最有效的公私合作形式是特许经营——授权执行机构或地方政府为了满足公共需求,在有偿和固定的基础上签订合同,特许经营公司对特许经营对象进行管理的过程,特许经营公司承担财产责任,并可能分担商业风险。进一步研究展望。需要研究其他形式的公私伙伴关系在住房和公共服务方面的利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信