The importance of tree height in estimating individual tree biomass while considering errors in measurements and allometric models.

Thuch Phalla, T. Ota, N. Mizoue, T. Kajisa, S. Yoshida, M. Vuthy, S. Heng
{"title":"The importance of tree height in estimating individual tree biomass while considering errors in measurements and allometric models.","authors":"Thuch Phalla, T. Ota, N. Mizoue, T. Kajisa, S. Yoshida, M. Vuthy, S. Heng","doi":"10.17503/agrivita.v40i1.1730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated the uncertainty of individual tree biomass estimated by allometric models by both including and excluding tree height independently. Using two independent sets of measurements on the same trees, the errors in the measurement of diameter at breast height and tree height were quantified, and the uncertainty of individual tree biomass estimation caused by errors in measurement was calculated. For both allometric models, the uncertainties of the individual tree biomass estimation caused by the use of a specific allometric model were also calculated. Finally, the overall uncertainty of individual tree biomass by combining the two uncertainties was calculated. The allometric model including tree height was 6 % more accurate than that excluding tree height when the uncertainty caused by allometric models became the only consideration. However, in terms of the uncertainty caused by measurement, the allometric model excluding tree height was three times more accurate than allometric model including tree height. As a result, the allometric model excluding tree height was 5 % more accurate than the allometric model including tree height when both causes of uncertainty, the allometric model and measurement errors were considered. In conclusion, errors in tree height measurement have the potential to increase the error of aboveground biomass estimation.","PeriodicalId":402006,"journal":{"name":"Agrivita : Journal of Agricultural Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrivita : Journal of Agricultural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v40i1.1730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This study evaluated the uncertainty of individual tree biomass estimated by allometric models by both including and excluding tree height independently. Using two independent sets of measurements on the same trees, the errors in the measurement of diameter at breast height and tree height were quantified, and the uncertainty of individual tree biomass estimation caused by errors in measurement was calculated. For both allometric models, the uncertainties of the individual tree biomass estimation caused by the use of a specific allometric model were also calculated. Finally, the overall uncertainty of individual tree biomass by combining the two uncertainties was calculated. The allometric model including tree height was 6 % more accurate than that excluding tree height when the uncertainty caused by allometric models became the only consideration. However, in terms of the uncertainty caused by measurement, the allometric model excluding tree height was three times more accurate than allometric model including tree height. As a result, the allometric model excluding tree height was 5 % more accurate than the allometric model including tree height when both causes of uncertainty, the allometric model and measurement errors were considered. In conclusion, errors in tree height measurement have the potential to increase the error of aboveground biomass estimation.
在考虑测量误差和异速生长模型的情况下,树高在估算单株生物量中的重要性。
本研究通过独立考虑和排除树高,评估了异速生长模型估算的单株生物量的不确定性。利用两组独立的测量数据,对胸径和树高测量误差进行了量化,并计算了测量误差对单株生物量估算的不确定度。对于两种异速生长模型,还计算了使用特定异速生长模型引起的单株生物量估算的不确定性。最后,结合这两种不确定性计算了单株生物量的总体不确定性。当只考虑异速生长模型引起的不确定性时,考虑树高的异速生长模型比不考虑树高的异速生长模型精度高6%。但在测量引起的不确定性方面,不考虑树高的异速生长模型比考虑树高的异速生长模型精度高3倍。结果表明,在考虑不确定性因素、异速生长模型和测量误差的情况下,不考虑树高的异速生长模型比考虑树高的异速生长模型的精度高5%。综上所述,树高测量误差有可能增加地上生物量估算误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信