Reliability Evaluation of Microservices and Monolithic Architectures

2022 International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network, and Intelligent Multimedia (CENIM) Pub Date : 2022-11-22 DOI:10.1109/CENIM56801.2022.10037281

A. B. Raharjo, Putu Krisna Andyartha, William Handi Wijaya, Yudhi Purwananto, D. Purwitasari, Nyoman Juniarta

{"title":"Reliability Evaluation of Microservices and Monolithic Architectures","authors":"A. B. Raharjo, Putu Krisna Andyartha, William Handi Wijaya, Yudhi Purwananto, D. Purwitasari, Nyoman Juniarta","doi":"10.1109/CENIM56801.2022.10037281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software is continuously evolving as business processes that needed to be solved become increasingly complex. Software architecture is an important aspect during software design, with monolithic and microservices being two of the most common with their own advantages and disadvantages. Monolithic is a unified system with a relatively fast development time. Meanwhile, microservices facilitates low coupling and high cohesion, prioritizing maintenance, and ease of modification post-development. This research compares microservices and monolithic API-based thesis monitoring systems. Implementations are done using PHP, Redis, PostgreSQL, Docker, and Heroku. Reliability evaluations are done through automated tests with Apache JMeter. Metrics used are maturity, availability, fault tolerance, and recoverability based on the ISO/IEC 25010 reliability quality characteristics. The conclusion section showed that microservices are more reliable than the monolithic by demonstrating much better fault tolerance and recoverability, with comparable maturity and availability.","PeriodicalId":118934,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network, and Intelligent Multimedia (CENIM)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network, and Intelligent Multimedia (CENIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CENIM56801.2022.10037281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Software is continuously evolving as business processes that needed to be solved become increasingly complex. Software architecture is an important aspect during software design, with monolithic and microservices being two of the most common with their own advantages and disadvantages. Monolithic is a unified system with a relatively fast development time. Meanwhile, microservices facilitates low coupling and high cohesion, prioritizing maintenance, and ease of modification post-development. This research compares microservices and monolithic API-based thesis monitoring systems. Implementations are done using PHP, Redis, PostgreSQL, Docker, and Heroku. Reliability evaluations are done through automated tests with Apache JMeter. Metrics used are maturity, availability, fault tolerance, and recoverability based on the ISO/IEC 25010 reliability quality characteristics. The conclusion section showed that microservices are more reliable than the monolithic by demonstrating much better fault tolerance and recoverability, with comparable maturity and availability.

查看原文本刊更多论文

微服务和单片架构的可靠性评估

随着需要解决的业务流程变得越来越复杂，软件也在不断发展。软件架构是软件设计过程中的一个重要方面，单片和微服务是最常见的两种架构，它们各有优缺点。单片机是一种统一的系统，开发速度相对较快。同时，微服务促进了低耦合和高内聚、优先级维护和易于开发后修改。本研究比较了微服务和基于单片api的论文监控系统。实现使用PHP, Redis, PostgreSQL, Docker和Heroku完成。可靠性评估是通过Apache JMeter的自动化测试完成的。所使用的度量标准是基于ISO/IEC 25010可靠性质量特征的成熟度、可用性、容错性和可恢复性。结论部分通过展示更好的容错性和可恢复性，以及相当的成熟度和可用性，表明微服务比整体服务更可靠。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

2022 International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network, and Intelligent Multimedia (CENIM)

自引率

0.00%

发文量