Human Connection in the Light of the Writings of Karl Marx and Amartya Sen

S. Mukhopadhyay
{"title":"Human Connection in the Light of the Writings of Karl Marx and Amartya Sen","authors":"S. Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.3167/ijsq.2019.090204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article uses Karl Marx’s notions of alienation and antagonism to understand human connection, defined as the interrelationship between human beings that helps transcend self-interest and fosters the sense of solidarity. The Marxian notions are revisited using the works of Amartya Sen, particularly those on identity and violence. Sen’s critique of rationality is discussed, invoking his notions of sympathy, antipathy, and commitment. The article uses two texts, Franz Kafka’s Metamorphosis and Manik Bandyopadhyay’s Ekannoborti, as vantage points to understand the key concepts of Marx and Sen. It then discusses the backgrounds of the authors and the political interpretations of their work and shows how the overriding importance ascribed to a particular identity may convolute the literary motivation of an author.","PeriodicalId":110013,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Social Quality","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Social Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/ijsq.2019.090204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article uses Karl Marx’s notions of alienation and antagonism to understand human connection, defined as the interrelationship between human beings that helps transcend self-interest and fosters the sense of solidarity. The Marxian notions are revisited using the works of Amartya Sen, particularly those on identity and violence. Sen’s critique of rationality is discussed, invoking his notions of sympathy, antipathy, and commitment. The article uses two texts, Franz Kafka’s Metamorphosis and Manik Bandyopadhyay’s Ekannoborti, as vantage points to understand the key concepts of Marx and Sen. It then discusses the backgrounds of the authors and the political interpretations of their work and shows how the overriding importance ascribed to a particular identity may convolute the literary motivation of an author.
从马克思和阿马蒂亚·森的著作看人的关系
本文使用马克思的异化和对抗的概念来理解人与人之间的联系,定义为人与人之间的相互关系,有助于超越自我利益并培养团结感。阿马蒂亚·森(Amartya Sen)的作品重新审视了马克思主义的概念,尤其是那些关于身份和暴力的作品。讨论了森对理性的批判,引用了他的同情、反感和承诺的概念。本文以卡夫卡的《变形记》和曼尼克·班约帕德哈伊的《埃卡诺博蒂》这两篇文章为切入点,理解马克思和森的关键概念,然后讨论了作者的背景和他们作品的政治解释,并展示了赋予特定身份的压倒一切的重要性是如何混淆作者的文学动机的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书