Comparative Analysis of the Influence of Coaches' Beliefs on the Attitude of Athletes to the Use of Prohibited Substances

A. Hovhannisyan, G.G. Sahakyan, T. Ukleba, E. Arhip, G. Jalleh, R. Donovan
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Influence of Coaches' Beliefs on the Attitude of Athletes to the Use of Prohibited Substances","authors":"A. Hovhannisyan, G.G. Sahakyan, T. Ukleba, E. Arhip, G. Jalleh, R. Donovan","doi":"10.46991/bysu:f/2023.14.1.065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the beliefs and attitudes towards doping of Coaches and Athletes in Armenia, Georgia and Moldova, and on the similarities and differences between Armenia, Georgia and Moldova on these measures.\nIn total, 270 coaches and 810 athletes were selected and completed the questionnaire. Self-completion questionnaires for coaches and athletes were developed in a first-phase Pilot study and approved by World Anti-Doping Agency. Overall, 14% of participants represented team sports disciplines and 86% represented individual sports disciplines. More than half of the athletes were international-level athletes. About 80% of coaches and athletes were males. Whilst there was some variation between the three countries in mean ages and experience of participants, none of these was statistically significant. Analyzing the results, we can conclude that the social and professional behavior of coaches may not be the reason that may push athletes to use the Prohibited substances. The great danger is the illiteracy of coaches in the anti-doping field.\nIf we compare the results obtained in this study with previous data in other studies, it can be assumed that coaches' delusions are transmitted to athletes, which are formed as a result of receiving incorrect information from other coaches or the media. In some cases, such as in relation to the Prohibited List, this may lead to unforeseen consequences. The obtained results show that it mandatory to include the information in the educational programs for coaches, about the athletes’ duties, ways and means to control their behavior, revealing in detail the mechanisms of such control. A necessary condition for the new Educational program for coaches may also be the holding of education seminars and workshops for athletes with the obligatory presence of their coaches using “the coach and his athletes” formula.","PeriodicalId":156559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University","volume":"178 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46991/bysu:f/2023.14.1.065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on the beliefs and attitudes towards doping of Coaches and Athletes in Armenia, Georgia and Moldova, and on the similarities and differences between Armenia, Georgia and Moldova on these measures. In total, 270 coaches and 810 athletes were selected and completed the questionnaire. Self-completion questionnaires for coaches and athletes were developed in a first-phase Pilot study and approved by World Anti-Doping Agency. Overall, 14% of participants represented team sports disciplines and 86% represented individual sports disciplines. More than half of the athletes were international-level athletes. About 80% of coaches and athletes were males. Whilst there was some variation between the three countries in mean ages and experience of participants, none of these was statistically significant. Analyzing the results, we can conclude that the social and professional behavior of coaches may not be the reason that may push athletes to use the Prohibited substances. The great danger is the illiteracy of coaches in the anti-doping field. If we compare the results obtained in this study with previous data in other studies, it can be assumed that coaches' delusions are transmitted to athletes, which are formed as a result of receiving incorrect information from other coaches or the media. In some cases, such as in relation to the Prohibited List, this may lead to unforeseen consequences. The obtained results show that it mandatory to include the information in the educational programs for coaches, about the athletes’ duties, ways and means to control their behavior, revealing in detail the mechanisms of such control. A necessary condition for the new Educational program for coaches may also be the holding of education seminars and workshops for athletes with the obligatory presence of their coaches using “the coach and his athletes” formula.
教练员信念对运动员使用禁药态度影响的比较分析
本研究的重点是亚美尼亚、格鲁吉亚和摩尔多瓦的教练员和运动员对兴奋剂的信念和态度,以及亚美尼亚、格鲁吉亚和摩尔多瓦在这些措施上的异同。共选取270名教练和810名运动员完成问卷调查。教练员和运动员的自我填写问卷是在第一阶段的试点研究中开发的,并得到了世界反兴奋剂机构的批准。总体而言,14%的参与者代表团队运动项目,86%代表个人运动项目。超过一半的运动员是国际水平的运动员。大约80%的教练和运动员是男性。虽然三个国家在参与者的平均年龄和经验方面存在一些差异,但这些差异在统计上都不显著。分析结果可以得出结论,教练员的社会和职业行为可能不是促使运动员使用违禁药物的原因。最大的危险是教练在反兴奋剂领域的无知。如果我们将本研究的结果与以往其他研究的数据进行比较,可以认为教练员的错觉是传递给运动员的,是由于从其他教练员或媒体那里接收到不正确的信息而形成的。在某些情况下,例如与禁止清单有关的情况,这可能会导致无法预见的后果。研究结果表明,在教练员的教育计划中,必须包括运动员的职责、控制运动员行为的方式和手段,并详细揭示这种控制的机制。新的教练员教育计划的一个必要条件,也可能是在教练员强制出席的情况下,按照“教练员和他的运动员”的公式,为运动员举办教育研讨会和讲习班。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信