Contrast-Enhanced UltraSound (CEUS)-based characterization solid renal masses: a role for quantitative imaging approaches

B. Varghese, Marielena Rivas, S. Cen, X. Lei, Michael Chang, K. Lee, Jamie Gunter, Renata L. Amoedo, Mario Franco, D. Hwang, B. Desai, Kevin G. King, P. Cheng, V. Duddalwar
{"title":"Contrast-Enhanced UltraSound (CEUS)-based characterization solid renal masses: a role for quantitative imaging approaches","authors":"B. Varghese, Marielena Rivas, S. Cen, X. Lei, Michael Chang, K. Lee, Jamie Gunter, Renata L. Amoedo, Mario Franco, D. Hwang, B. Desai, Kevin G. King, P. Cheng, V. Duddalwar","doi":"10.1117/12.2670366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this prospective study, forty patients with solid renal masses who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations were selected. Using the ImageJ software, renal masses and adjacent normal tissue were manually segmented from CEUS cine exams obtained using the built-in RS85 Samsung scanner software. For the radiomics analysis, one frame representing precontrast, early, peak, and delay enhancement phase were selected post segmentation from each CEUS clip. From each region of interest (ROI) within a tumor tissue normalized renal mass, 112 radiomic metrics were extracted using custom Matlab® code. For the time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, the segmented ROIs were plotted as a function of time, and the data were fit to a washout curve. From these time-signal intensity curves, perfusion quantitative parameters, were generated. Wilcoxon rank sum test or univariate independent t-test depending on data normality were used for descriptive analyses. Agreement was analyzed using Kappa statistic. Of the 40 solid masses, 31 (77.5%) were malignant, 9 (22.5%) were benign based on histopathology. Excellent agreement was found between histopathological confirmation and visual assessment based on CEUS in discriminating solid renal masses into benign vs. malignant categories (κ=0.89 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.77,1)). The total agreement between the two was 92.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS-based visual assessment was found to be 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Quantitative analysis revealed TIC metrics revealed statistically significant differences between the malignant and benign groups and between clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) subtypes. The study shows excellent agreement between visual assessment and histopathology, but with the room to improve in specificity.","PeriodicalId":147201,"journal":{"name":"Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2670366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this prospective study, forty patients with solid renal masses who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations were selected. Using the ImageJ software, renal masses and adjacent normal tissue were manually segmented from CEUS cine exams obtained using the built-in RS85 Samsung scanner software. For the radiomics analysis, one frame representing precontrast, early, peak, and delay enhancement phase were selected post segmentation from each CEUS clip. From each region of interest (ROI) within a tumor tissue normalized renal mass, 112 radiomic metrics were extracted using custom Matlab® code. For the time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, the segmented ROIs were plotted as a function of time, and the data were fit to a washout curve. From these time-signal intensity curves, perfusion quantitative parameters, were generated. Wilcoxon rank sum test or univariate independent t-test depending on data normality were used for descriptive analyses. Agreement was analyzed using Kappa statistic. Of the 40 solid masses, 31 (77.5%) were malignant, 9 (22.5%) were benign based on histopathology. Excellent agreement was found between histopathological confirmation and visual assessment based on CEUS in discriminating solid renal masses into benign vs. malignant categories (κ=0.89 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.77,1)). The total agreement between the two was 92.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS-based visual assessment was found to be 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Quantitative analysis revealed TIC metrics revealed statistically significant differences between the malignant and benign groups and between clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) subtypes. The study shows excellent agreement between visual assessment and histopathology, but with the room to improve in specificity.
基于造影增强超声(CEUS)的实性肾肿块表征:定量成像方法的作用
在这项前瞻性研究中,选择了40例接受超声造影检查的实性肾肿块患者。使用ImageJ软件,从内置RS85三星扫描软件获得的超声造影电影检查中手动分割肾肿块和邻近正常组织。对于放射组学分析,从每个CEUS片段分割后选择一帧代表对比度前、早期、峰值和延迟增强阶段。从肿瘤组织归一化肾块内的每个感兴趣区域(ROI)中,使用定制的Matlab®代码提取112个放射学指标。对于时间强度曲线(TIC)分析,将分割的roi绘制为时间的函数,并将数据拟合为冲洗曲线。从这些时间-信号强度曲线生成灌注定量参数。描述性分析采用基于数据正态性的Wilcoxon秩和检验或单变量独立t检验。采用Kappa统计量进行一致性分析。40例实性肿块中,31例(77.5%)为恶性,9例(22.5%)为良性。基于超声造影(CEUS)的组织病理证实和视觉评估在区分实性肾肿块良恶性分类方面非常一致(κ=0.89 95%可信区间(CI): 0.77,1)。两者之间的总协议为92.5%。基于ceas的视觉评价灵敏度为100%,特异度为66.7%。定量分析显示TIC指标显示恶性组和良性组以及透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)和乳头状肾细胞癌(pRCC)亚型之间存在统计学差异。该研究显示视觉评估和组织病理学之间有很好的一致性,但在特异性上有改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信