The Coming(?) Inflation and the Income Tax: Lessons from the Past, Lessons for the Future

David Gliksberg
{"title":"The Coming(?) Inflation and the Income Tax: Lessons from the Past, Lessons for the Future","authors":"David Gliksberg","doi":"10.5744/ftr.2010.1004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concerns about inflation as a result of the current financial crisis and the U.S. budget deficit challenge the social order, including taxation. Based on the historical U.S. experience and discourse on this issue, the article focuses on the relationships between adjusting the tax system for inflation and the general attitude towards adjustment for inflation in the social order. The article offers a new insight which is very different from the current research. The nominalism/adjustism culture that dominates the social order is placed at the center of the analysis. There is “equilibrium” between the scope of adjustment in the social order and in the tax regime. Advancing adjustment of the tax regime requires that it also be promoted in the general social order. This cultural paradigm plays a significant role in the tax response to inflation, including the scope and character of that adjustment regime. This approach erodes the literature’s conservative approach arguing that classical tax policy consideration like cost-benefit analysis is the most effective factor on the adjustment issue. The article argues that adopting an adjusted tax regime is largely dependent on the existence and extent of a general culture towards the concept of “money”: Is the prevailing culture one of nominalism or adjustism?This paradigm explains the reality in the U.S. in the past with regards to adjustment for inflation. The sophisticated American discourse on adjusting the income tax regime for inflation, which first took place in the late nineteen seventies and early nineteen eighties, was unproductive from the start, and was doomed to failure because the U.S. culture of adjustism was not sufficiently ripe for justifying or permitting a “legitimate” social decision on adjusting the tax regime. The lessons from the past are that advancing adjustment of the tax regime requires promoting adjustment of the general social order. Adjusting the income tax regime without adjusting the general social order would be, culturally, a tough mission and even impossible.","PeriodicalId":289078,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Prices","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Prices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/ftr.2010.1004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concerns about inflation as a result of the current financial crisis and the U.S. budget deficit challenge the social order, including taxation. Based on the historical U.S. experience and discourse on this issue, the article focuses on the relationships between adjusting the tax system for inflation and the general attitude towards adjustment for inflation in the social order. The article offers a new insight which is very different from the current research. The nominalism/adjustism culture that dominates the social order is placed at the center of the analysis. There is “equilibrium” between the scope of adjustment in the social order and in the tax regime. Advancing adjustment of the tax regime requires that it also be promoted in the general social order. This cultural paradigm plays a significant role in the tax response to inflation, including the scope and character of that adjustment regime. This approach erodes the literature’s conservative approach arguing that classical tax policy consideration like cost-benefit analysis is the most effective factor on the adjustment issue. The article argues that adopting an adjusted tax regime is largely dependent on the existence and extent of a general culture towards the concept of “money”: Is the prevailing culture one of nominalism or adjustism?This paradigm explains the reality in the U.S. in the past with regards to adjustment for inflation. The sophisticated American discourse on adjusting the income tax regime for inflation, which first took place in the late nineteen seventies and early nineteen eighties, was unproductive from the start, and was doomed to failure because the U.S. culture of adjustism was not sufficiently ripe for justifying or permitting a “legitimate” social decision on adjusting the tax regime. The lessons from the past are that advancing adjustment of the tax regime requires promoting adjustment of the general social order. Adjusting the income tax regime without adjusting the general social order would be, culturally, a tough mission and even impossible.
未来(?)通货膨胀和所得税:过去的教训,未来的教训
对当前金融危机和美国预算赤字导致的通货膨胀的担忧挑战了包括税收在内的社会秩序。本文以美国的历史经验和有关通货膨胀问题的论述为基础,重点探讨了针对通货膨胀调整税收制度与社会秩序中对通货膨胀调整的普遍态度之间的关系。这篇文章提供了一个与现有研究截然不同的新视角。主宰社会秩序的唯名主义/调整主义文化被置于分析的中心。在社会秩序和税收制度的调整范围之间存在“均衡”。推进税制调整,也要在社会大局中推进税制调整。这种文化模式在税收对通货膨胀的反应,包括调整制度的范围和特征方面发挥着重要作用。这种方法削弱了文献的保守方法,认为传统的税收政策考虑,如成本效益分析,是调整问题上最有效的因素。本文认为,采用调整后的税收制度在很大程度上取决于对“金钱”概念的一般文化的存在和程度:盛行的文化是唯名主义还是调整主义?这种模式解释了美国过去在通货膨胀调整方面的现实。美国关于调整所得税制度以应对通货膨胀的复杂论述,最早出现在20世纪70年代末和80年代初,从一开始就没有成效,而且注定要失败,因为美国的调整文化还不够成熟,不足以证明或允许一个“合法”的社会决定来调整税收制度。过去的经验教训是,推进税制调整需要促进社会总秩序的调整。在不调整总体社会秩序的情况下调整所得税制度,在文化上是一项艰巨的任务,甚至是不可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信