A New Scoring: Can Brescia-COVID Respiratory Severity Scale Predict Mortality in Intensive Care?

Burcu İleri Fikri, Ezgi Direnç Kulunk, G. Turan
{"title":"A New Scoring: Can Brescia-COVID Respiratory Severity Scale Predict Mortality in Intensive Care?","authors":"Burcu İleri Fikri, Ezgi Direnç Kulunk, G. Turan","doi":"10.4274/csmedj.galenos.2021.2021-11-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to compare the Brescia-coronavirus disease (COVID) severity scale (BCRSS) with acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE-II) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores in terms of predicting mortality in patients with severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Material and Methods: BCRSS, SOFA, and APACHE-II scores of patients with severe COVID-19 were calculated when they were first admitted to the intensive care unit. BCRSS score calculation was repeated at the 48 hour. Further treatment, intubation rates, and the result of the intensive care process were recorded and compared. Results and Conclusion: When the three scoring systems are evaluated as the mortality indicators, SOFA score did not provide a statistically significant difference (p>0.05), whereas the APACHE-II score was found to be significantly higher in the fatal cases (p<0.01). Furthermore, BCRSS scores at the time of intensive care unit admission and at 48 h were significantly higher in the fatal cases (p<0.01). As much as our experience with the disease has been increasing since the beginning of the pandemic, scoring systems are still used for patient triage area, intubation decisions, and directing the medical treatment. Although BCRSS, one of the COVID-19-specific scales, is yet to be validated, our results indicate its potential benefit for predicting IC mortality.","PeriodicalId":366898,"journal":{"name":"Cam and Sakura Medical Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cam and Sakura Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/csmedj.galenos.2021.2021-11-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare the Brescia-coronavirus disease (COVID) severity scale (BCRSS) with acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE-II) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores in terms of predicting mortality in patients with severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Material and Methods: BCRSS, SOFA, and APACHE-II scores of patients with severe COVID-19 were calculated when they were first admitted to the intensive care unit. BCRSS score calculation was repeated at the 48 hour. Further treatment, intubation rates, and the result of the intensive care process were recorded and compared. Results and Conclusion: When the three scoring systems are evaluated as the mortality indicators, SOFA score did not provide a statistically significant difference (p>0.05), whereas the APACHE-II score was found to be significantly higher in the fatal cases (p<0.01). Furthermore, BCRSS scores at the time of intensive care unit admission and at 48 h were significantly higher in the fatal cases (p<0.01). As much as our experience with the disease has been increasing since the beginning of the pandemic, scoring systems are still used for patient triage area, intubation decisions, and directing the medical treatment. Although BCRSS, one of the COVID-19-specific scales, is yet to be validated, our results indicate its potential benefit for predicting IC mortality.
一种新的评分方法:布雷西亚- covid呼吸严重程度量表能否预测重症监护患者的死亡率?
目的:本研究旨在比较布雷西亚冠状病毒病(COVID)严重程度量表(BCRSS)与急性生理与慢性健康评估II (APACHE-II)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对严重冠状病毒病-2019 (COVID-19)患者死亡率的预测作用。材料与方法:计算重症COVID-19患者首次入住重症监护室时的BCRSS、SOFA和APACHE-II评分。48 h时再次计算BCRSS评分。记录和比较进一步治疗、插管率和重症监护过程的结果。结果与结论:以3种评分系统作为死亡指标时,SOFA评分差异无统计学意义(p>0.05),而APACHE-II评分在死亡病例中显著高于SOFA评分(p<0.01)。死亡病例入院时和48 h时的BCRSS评分显著高于死亡病例(p<0.01)。尽管自大流行开始以来,我们对该疾病的经验不断增加,但评分系统仍用于患者分诊、插管决定和指导医疗。虽然BCRSS是covid -19特异性量表之一,尚未得到验证,但我们的研究结果表明其在预测IC死亡率方面的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信