Usability Evaluation of Online Learning Management System: Blackboard, Google Classroom and Canvas

2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET) Pub Date : 2023-03-18 DOI:10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111426

M. J. Gumasing, Eunice Kaye Endozo, Jun Carl Ceasar Laingo, William Henry Tapucar

{"title":"Usability Evaluation of Online Learning Management System: Blackboard, Google Classroom and Canvas","authors":"M. J. Gumasing, Eunice Kaye Endozo, Jun Carl Ceasar Laingo, William Henry Tapucar","doi":"10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A learning management system (LMS) is a software program or web-based technology that is used to design, implement, and evaluate a learning process. Also, this allows an instructor to generate and distribute curriculum, track student involvement, and evaluate student performance These platforms had extended a great help especially now that students are in the mode of online education. The objective of this study is to assess the usability of Blackboard, Canvas and Google Classroom as an LMS based on the user’s satisfaction. Also, to know if there is a significant difference with these LMS in terms of usability. This study utilized a system usability scale questionnaire to determine the usability of Blackboard, Canvas and Google Classroom through online survey. One-way Anova is used to analyze the System Usability Rating and with the p-value of 0.054 which is greater than the alpha value 0.5, it is concluded that there is no significant difference between the usability and satisfaction of blackboard, Canvas and Google Classroom based on a usability criterion given.","PeriodicalId":332586,"journal":{"name":"2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

A learning management system (LMS) is a software program or web-based technology that is used to design, implement, and evaluate a learning process. Also, this allows an instructor to generate and distribute curriculum, track student involvement, and evaluate student performance These platforms had extended a great help especially now that students are in the mode of online education. The objective of this study is to assess the usability of Blackboard, Canvas and Google Classroom as an LMS based on the user’s satisfaction. Also, to know if there is a significant difference with these LMS in terms of usability. This study utilized a system usability scale questionnaire to determine the usability of Blackboard, Canvas and Google Classroom through online survey. One-way Anova is used to analyze the System Usability Rating and with the p-value of 0.054 which is greater than the alpha value 0.5, it is concluded that there is no significant difference between the usability and satisfaction of blackboard, Canvas and Google Classroom based on a usability criterion given.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在线学习管理系统的可用性评价:Blackboard、Google Classroom和Canvas

学习管理系统(LMS)是一种软件程序或基于网络的技术，用于设计、实施和评估学习过程。此外，这允许教师生成和分发课程，跟踪学生的参与情况，并评估学生的表现。这些平台提供了很大的帮助，特别是现在学生处于在线教育模式。本研究的目的是基于用户满意度来评估Blackboard、Canvas和Google Classroom作为LMS的可用性。此外，要了解这些LMS在可用性方面是否存在显著差异。本研究采用系统可用性量表问卷，通过在线调查来确定Blackboard、Canvas和Google Classroom的可用性。采用单因素方差分析对系统可用性评分进行分析，p值为0.054，大于alpha值0.5，根据给定的可用性标准，得出黑板、画布和谷歌课堂的可用性和满意度之间没有显著差异的结论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)

自引率

0.00%

发文量