Risk-informed assessment of regional preparedness

K. Crowther
{"title":"Risk-informed assessment of regional preparedness","authors":"K. Crowther","doi":"10.1109/THS.2010.5655049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk-informed and sustainable preparedness of our nation's regions and localities is central to the safety and security of the United States. The first step to technology development for preparedness is clear requirements and correct methodologies. This paper presents methods for creating regional homeland security plans to ensure continuity of regional operations. First, regional preparedness strategy should focus on a region's vital socioeconomic interests. These industries can be identified through the application of key sector analysis methods that exploit large-scale and open-source databases reporting economic sector production and interdependence. Second, planning for regional preparedness should follow two complementary approaches focusing on catastrophic scenario-driven planning as well as all-hazards capabilities. Third, regional preparedness strategy should exploit existing organizations and preparedness governance structure. Most existing regional preparedness institutions organize around the concept of emergency support functions (ESFs). Defining the relationships between ESFs and critical infrastructure sectors will enable these existing organizations to broaden their mission to adopt more holistic preparedness planning and homeland security practices, and provide a foundation technology. This paper provides preliminary results from case studies in Virginia to illustrate each of these methods.","PeriodicalId":106557,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/THS.2010.5655049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk-informed and sustainable preparedness of our nation's regions and localities is central to the safety and security of the United States. The first step to technology development for preparedness is clear requirements and correct methodologies. This paper presents methods for creating regional homeland security plans to ensure continuity of regional operations. First, regional preparedness strategy should focus on a region's vital socioeconomic interests. These industries can be identified through the application of key sector analysis methods that exploit large-scale and open-source databases reporting economic sector production and interdependence. Second, planning for regional preparedness should follow two complementary approaches focusing on catastrophic scenario-driven planning as well as all-hazards capabilities. Third, regional preparedness strategy should exploit existing organizations and preparedness governance structure. Most existing regional preparedness institutions organize around the concept of emergency support functions (ESFs). Defining the relationships between ESFs and critical infrastructure sectors will enable these existing organizations to broaden their mission to adopt more holistic preparedness planning and homeland security practices, and provide a foundation technology. This paper provides preliminary results from case studies in Virginia to illustrate each of these methods.
对区域准备进行风险知情评估
我们国家各地区和地方的风险知情和可持续准备对美国的安全和保障至关重要。技术开发的第一步是明确的需求和正确的方法。本文提出了制定区域国土安全计划的方法,以确保区域行动的连续性。首先,区域防范战略应侧重于一个地区的重要社会经济利益。这些行业可以通过应用关键部门分析方法来确定,这些方法利用报告经济部门生产和相互依存的大型开源数据库。其次,区域备灾规划应遵循两种互补的方法,侧重于灾难性情景驱动的规划以及所有灾害的能力。第三,区域备灾战略应利用现有的组织和备灾治理结构。大多数现有的区域备灾机构都是围绕紧急支助职能的概念组织起来的。定义esf和关键基础设施部门之间的关系将使这些现有组织能够扩大其使命,采用更全面的准备规划和国土安全实践,并提供基础技术。本文提供了弗吉尼亚州案例研究的初步结果,以说明每种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信