Global versus local kinematic skills assessment on robotic assisted hysterectomies

A. Huaulmé, Krystel Nyango Timoh, V. Jan, S. Guerin, P. Jannin
{"title":"Global versus local kinematic skills assessment on robotic assisted hysterectomies","authors":"A. Huaulmé, Krystel Nyango Timoh, V. Jan, S. Guerin, P. Jannin","doi":"10.31256/hsmr2023.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surgical skills assessment is a crucial step to help understanding surgical expertise and to provide technical knowledge to beginners. Scores, such as GOALS [1], have been designed to assess surgical skills. However, these scores are subjective and need experts to compute them. With the advent of robotic surgery, it is possible to compute Automated Performance Metrics (APMs) based on the motion of robotic arms to assess surgical skills. Several studies have demonstrated statistically significant differences between APMs from different levels of expertise [2], [3]. The majority of these studies performed a global analysis, i.e., studying the surgical procedure or training task as a whole. By using the Surgical Process Model (SPM) methodology [4], it is possible to describe the surgery at different levels of granularity and break it down into a sequence of elements. Riffaud et al. [5], decomposed Lumbar Disc herniation surgery by phases and demonstrated that the main expertise differences in terms of duration are due to specific phases or actions. In this paper, we will combine SPM and APMs to study global and local kinematic skills during robotic-assisted hysterectomies.","PeriodicalId":129686,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The 15th Hamlyn Symposium on Medical Robotics 2023","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The 15th Hamlyn Symposium on Medical Robotics 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31256/hsmr2023.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical skills assessment is a crucial step to help understanding surgical expertise and to provide technical knowledge to beginners. Scores, such as GOALS [1], have been designed to assess surgical skills. However, these scores are subjective and need experts to compute them. With the advent of robotic surgery, it is possible to compute Automated Performance Metrics (APMs) based on the motion of robotic arms to assess surgical skills. Several studies have demonstrated statistically significant differences between APMs from different levels of expertise [2], [3]. The majority of these studies performed a global analysis, i.e., studying the surgical procedure or training task as a whole. By using the Surgical Process Model (SPM) methodology [4], it is possible to describe the surgery at different levels of granularity and break it down into a sequence of elements. Riffaud et al. [5], decomposed Lumbar Disc herniation surgery by phases and demonstrated that the main expertise differences in terms of duration are due to specific phases or actions. In this paper, we will combine SPM and APMs to study global and local kinematic skills during robotic-assisted hysterectomies.
机器人辅助子宫切除术的全局与局部运动学技能评估
手术技能评估是帮助了解外科专业知识和为初学者提供技术知识的关键步骤。诸如GOALS[1]等评分被设计用于评估手术技能。然而,这些分数是主观的,需要专家来计算。随着机器人手术的出现,基于机器人手臂的运动计算自动性能指标(APMs)来评估手术技能成为可能。几项研究表明,不同专业水平的apm之间存在统计学上的显著差异[2],[3]。这些研究中的大多数进行了全局分析,即从整体上研究手术过程或训练任务。通过使用手术过程模型(Surgical Process Model, SPM)方法[4],可以在不同的粒度级别上描述手术,并将其分解为一系列元素。Riffaud等[5]将腰椎间盘突出症手术按阶段进行分解,并证明持续时间方面的主要专业知识差异是由于特定的阶段或动作。在本文中,我们将结合SPM和APMs来研究机器人辅助子宫切除术中的全局和局部运动学技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信