A Performance Comparison of LSTM and Recursive SID Methods in Thermal Modeling of Implantable Medical Devices

Ayca Ermis, Mi Zhou, Yen-Pang Lai, Ying Zhang
{"title":"A Performance Comparison of LSTM and Recursive SID Methods in Thermal Modeling of Implantable Medical Devices","authors":"Ayca Ermis, Mi Zhou, Yen-Pang Lai, Ying Zhang","doi":"10.1109/CCTA41146.2020.9206293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates application of long short-term memory (LSTM) and recursive system identification (RSID) algorithms to predict the thermal dynamics of bio-implants, e.g. UEA under certain assumptions. Both algorithms implemented in this paper predict the temperature readings of heat sensors using a window size of 10 data points. Simulations in COMSOL software as well as experiments using an in vitro experimental systems are utilized for validation and comparison of algorithm performances. Mean squared error (MSE) of prediction results based on the LSTM algorithm is compared against that of the competitive RSID algorithm for evaluation. Both simulation and experimental results indicate that the LSTM can accurately predict the thermal dynamics of the system and outperforms the RSID algorithm when certain conditions for inputs hold. According to COMSOL simulations and in vitro experiments, the LSTM algorithm returns more reliable predictions for the time period in which the convergence of the adaptive filters in the RSID algorithm is not yet achieved. Alternatively, once the adaptive filters converge, the performance of the RSID algorithm is significantly better than the LSTM for some cases due to its adaptive learning capabilities.","PeriodicalId":241335,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCTA41146.2020.9206293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates application of long short-term memory (LSTM) and recursive system identification (RSID) algorithms to predict the thermal dynamics of bio-implants, e.g. UEA under certain assumptions. Both algorithms implemented in this paper predict the temperature readings of heat sensors using a window size of 10 data points. Simulations in COMSOL software as well as experiments using an in vitro experimental systems are utilized for validation and comparison of algorithm performances. Mean squared error (MSE) of prediction results based on the LSTM algorithm is compared against that of the competitive RSID algorithm for evaluation. Both simulation and experimental results indicate that the LSTM can accurately predict the thermal dynamics of the system and outperforms the RSID algorithm when certain conditions for inputs hold. According to COMSOL simulations and in vitro experiments, the LSTM algorithm returns more reliable predictions for the time period in which the convergence of the adaptive filters in the RSID algorithm is not yet achieved. Alternatively, once the adaptive filters converge, the performance of the RSID algorithm is significantly better than the LSTM for some cases due to its adaptive learning capabilities.
LSTM与递归SID方法在植入式医疗器械热建模中的性能比较
本文研究了长短期记忆(LSTM)和递归系统识别(RSID)算法在特定假设下预测生物植入物(如UEA)热动力学的应用。本文实现的两种算法都使用10个数据点的窗口大小来预测热传感器的温度读数。在COMSOL软件中进行模拟,并使用体外实验系统进行实验,以验证和比较算法的性能。将基于LSTM算法的预测结果的均方误差(MSE)与竞争的RSID算法的预测结果进行比较,进行评价。仿真和实验结果表明,在一定的输入条件下,LSTM可以准确地预测系统的热动力学,并且优于RSID算法。根据COMSOL模拟和体外实验,LSTM算法在RSID算法中自适应滤波器尚未实现收敛的时间段内返回更可靠的预测。或者,一旦自适应滤波器收敛,由于RSID算法的自适应学习能力,在某些情况下,RSID算法的性能明显优于LSTM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信