Science and Politics of Base Station Electromagnetic Field Risks

Haim Mazar Madjar, D. Ball
{"title":"Science and Politics of Base Station Electromagnetic Field Risks","authors":"Haim Mazar Madjar, D. Ball","doi":"10.1109/comcas52219.2021.9629038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current science-based approach to ensuring public safety from RF-EMF base stations is described, and a potential misframing of the debate as a purely scientific issue, which in turn led to inappropriate risk communication exercises, is pointed to. Plausibly, this polarised and charged the situation by disenfranchising other potentially legitimate siting concerns. While the primary health recommendation remains unchanged, namely, to follow the guidelines set by the science-based ICNIRP and IEEE expert groups, and to limit the ICNIRP 2020 and IEEE 95.12019 power density exposure level for general-public: between 400 – 2000 MHz fMHz/200 (W/m2) and 10 (W/m2) above 2000 MHz, other legitimate concerns should not be disregarded.","PeriodicalId":354885,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Antennas, Communications and Electronic Systems (COMCAS)","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Antennas, Communications and Electronic Systems (COMCAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/comcas52219.2021.9629038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current science-based approach to ensuring public safety from RF-EMF base stations is described, and a potential misframing of the debate as a purely scientific issue, which in turn led to inappropriate risk communication exercises, is pointed to. Plausibly, this polarised and charged the situation by disenfranchising other potentially legitimate siting concerns. While the primary health recommendation remains unchanged, namely, to follow the guidelines set by the science-based ICNIRP and IEEE expert groups, and to limit the ICNIRP 2020 and IEEE 95.12019 power density exposure level for general-public: between 400 – 2000 MHz fMHz/200 (W/m2) and 10 (W/m2) above 2000 MHz, other legitimate concerns should not be disregarded.
基站电磁场风险的科学与政治
本文描述了目前以科学为基础的确保RF-EMF基站公共安全的方法,并指出可能将辩论错误地定义为纯粹的科学问题,从而导致不适当的风险沟通活动。这种做法剥夺了其他可能合理的选址问题的权利,从而使情况两极分化并加剧。虽然基本健康建议保持不变,即遵循基于科学的ICNIRP和IEEE专家组制定的指导方针,并将ICNIRP 2020和IEEE 95.12019的普通公众功率密度暴露水平限制在400 - 2000 MHz/200 (W/m2)和10 (W/m2)之间,但不应忽视其他合理的关切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信