Pragmatism, Euroscepticism and Integration: A Dynamic Approach

R. Rose
{"title":"Pragmatism, Euroscepticism and Integration: A Dynamic Approach","authors":"R. Rose","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2323445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Major proponents and opponents of European integration debate issues in terms of absolute values and ideology. Pragmatism offers a third way: it judges specific policies on the basis of experience -- and after more than half a century there is a lot of EU experience to judge. It analyses the causes of current problems with reference to evidence and it assesses costs and benefits of policies proposed to get rid of problems and make conditions better. This approach is not against European integration in principle. However, it is not in favour of an ever closer Union unless a pragmatic judgment of evidence makes a positive conclusion about likely benefits.","PeriodicalId":279834,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Public Opinion in the EU (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Public Opinion in the EU (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2323445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Major proponents and opponents of European integration debate issues in terms of absolute values and ideology. Pragmatism offers a third way: it judges specific policies on the basis of experience -- and after more than half a century there is a lot of EU experience to judge. It analyses the causes of current problems with reference to evidence and it assesses costs and benefits of policies proposed to get rid of problems and make conditions better. This approach is not against European integration in principle. However, it is not in favour of an ever closer Union unless a pragmatic judgment of evidence makes a positive conclusion about likely benefits.
实用主义、欧洲怀疑主义和一体化:一种动态的方法
欧洲一体化的主要支持者和反对者在绝对价值和意识形态方面争论问题。实用主义提供了第三种方式:它根据经验判断具体政策——半个多世纪过去了,欧盟有很多经验需要评判。它结合证据分析了当前问题的原因,并评估了为解决问题和改善条件而提出的政策的成本和效益。这种做法在原则上并不反对欧洲一体化。然而,除非对证据进行务实的判断,得出可能带来的好处的积极结论,否则欧盟不赞成建立一个日益紧密的联盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信