‘There is no better means of instruction on China than letting China speak for herself’: Thomas Percy and Hau Kiou Choaan

Mengmeng Yan
{"title":"‘There is no better means of instruction on China than letting China speak for herself’: Thomas Percy and Hau Kiou Choaan","authors":"Mengmeng Yan","doi":"10.31273/EIRJ.V4I1.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hau Kiou Choaan represents a fresh enquiry into literary orientalism in Britain of the eighteenth century. This article will discuss Percy's adaptation of Hau Kiou Choaan from an original Chinese novel, and how the ways in which Percy interprets the Chinese novel signify his peculiar views of China.  On the title page of Hau Kiou Choaan ; or, The Pleasing History (1761), Thomas Percy quotes from Jean-Baptiste Du Halde’s A Description of the Empire of China and of Chinese Tartary (1738): ‘There is no better means of instruction on China than letting China speak for herself’. It remains questionable, whether by presenting an original piece of Chinese literature, Percy has really let China ‘speak for herself’; it is reasonable to argue that Hau Kiou Choaan carries as much information about China as it does about Percy’s own perceptions of this country. Whether Percy’s works and views of China provoked louder criticism or higher praise, his input into the studies of China was a positive one, for it contributed to an increasingly vigorous debate that would increasingly perceive differences as a source of strength, not weakness.","PeriodicalId":268124,"journal":{"name":"Exchanges: The Warwick Research Journal","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exchanges: The Warwick Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31273/EIRJ.V4I1.148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hau Kiou Choaan represents a fresh enquiry into literary orientalism in Britain of the eighteenth century. This article will discuss Percy's adaptation of Hau Kiou Choaan from an original Chinese novel, and how the ways in which Percy interprets the Chinese novel signify his peculiar views of China.  On the title page of Hau Kiou Choaan ; or, The Pleasing History (1761), Thomas Percy quotes from Jean-Baptiste Du Halde’s A Description of the Empire of China and of Chinese Tartary (1738): ‘There is no better means of instruction on China than letting China speak for herself’. It remains questionable, whether by presenting an original piece of Chinese literature, Percy has really let China ‘speak for herself’; it is reasonable to argue that Hau Kiou Choaan carries as much information about China as it does about Percy’s own perceptions of this country. Whether Percy’s works and views of China provoked louder criticism or higher praise, his input into the studies of China was a positive one, for it contributed to an increasingly vigorous debate that would increasingly perceive differences as a source of strength, not weakness.
Thomas Percy和Hau Kiou Choaan:“没有比让中国为自己说话更好的教育中国的方法了。
侯乔安代表了对18世纪英国文学东方主义的一种新的探索。本文将讨论珀西对中国原著小说《孝孝》的改编,以及珀西对中国原著小说的解读如何体现了他对中国的独特看法。在《Hau kou Choaan》的扉页上;或者,在《愉悦的历史》(1761)中,托马斯·珀西引用了让-巴蒂斯特·杜·哈尔德的《中华帝国和中国鞑靼的描述》(1738):“没有比让中国为自己说话更好的教育中国的方法了。”通过呈现一部原创的中国文学作品,珀西是否真的让中国“为自己说话”,这仍然值得怀疑;我们有理由认为,《豪桥乔安》所承载的关于中国的信息与珀西本人对这个国家的看法一样多。无论珀西的作品和他对中国的看法是受到了更大的批评还是更高的赞扬,他对中国研究的投入都是积极的,因为它促成了一场日益激烈的辩论,人们越来越多地将差异视为力量的源泉,而不是弱点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信