Aim for high reliability

K. Drake
{"title":"Aim for high reliability","authors":"K. Drake","doi":"10.1097/01.NUMA.0000508264.64969.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"M ic h a e l Tr in s e y Standardizing processes within your organization will affect the quality of care on your unit because doing so meets the principles of high reliability: sensitivity to operations, reluctance to accept “simple” explanations for problems, preoccupation with failure, deference to expertise, and resiliency.1 These principles fall into two categories: anticipation and containment. First, let’s address the principles in the anticipation category. Sensitivity to operations means that operations are complex and dynamic. Consistent rounding on your unit gives you firsthand knowledge of challenges, opportunities, and best practices. Being transparent increases attention to patient care processes. For instance, you’re observing medication administration using a recently added bar code reader and you notice the nurse pulling the device’s cord due to its short length and dropping it as a result. You share the information with other leaders and it’s determined that this is a common issue; as a result, the bar code reader cords are replaced with longer ones. Reluctance to accept “simple” explanations for problems means to dig deep into answers by performing a root cause analysis. Continuing with our bar code reader example, you discover that a nurse makes a medication error. On your organization’s reporting tool, you document the “simple” explanation for the error: the unit was short staffed that shift. However, upon further review, the root cause was that the nurse overrode a process due to bar code reader failure, which contributed to the error. There was no record of the device being reported as defective or any attempt to obtain another bar code reader before administering the medication. Preoccupation with failure means that leaders are looking at how processes may break. Evaluating the good catches in your environment may lead to preventing future failures. Also, being thoughtful and observant of what’s working well assists in error prevention. Replicating what’s working well in other areas is essential for high-reliability organizations. Now, let’s review the principles in the containment category: deference to expertise and resiliency. A common misconception regarding deferring to an expert is that it’s based on seniority or positional hierarchy. In some cases, the process expert is the clinical nurse who performs the task daily. That’s why it’s important when changing products that we ask staff members to evaluate them. Another example is that employees who are new to your organization may communicate best practices from previous employers. As a leader, refrain from saying “I know” because this deters employees from sharing ideas that may lead to improvements. Resiliency is the ability to recover quickly in times of high stress, adapt well to change, keep focused, and learn from adversity. A clinical example of nursing resilience is during a code. Nurses stay focused in what may be a rapidly changing situation and rebound quickly afterward to care for the next patient. After the code, the team gathers to debrief and discuss what went well and what didn’t. The team learns from the situation and takes the new knowledge to future events. We can communicate the lessons from this event to others so that practice changes can be made. Resilience also indicates that your organization can find swift fixes to prevent errors. Enabling rapid cycle change assists with being highly reliable. As a leader, consider process standardization to be a positive step toward keeping your patients and staff safe. Your organization has observed failures or errors, which increases attention to processes (sensitivity of operations). In developing standardized processes, your organization has looked to data and root causes for future prevention (reluctance to accept “simple” explanations for problems). As a result, it has sought out best practices (deference to expertise) and examined good catches to implement changes to decrease the chance of future errors (preoccupation with failure). And learning the skills associated with the standardization will allow your staff members to grow and provide consistent care (resiliency). NM","PeriodicalId":358194,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Management (springhouse)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Management (springhouse)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000508264.64969.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

M ic h a e l Tr in s e y Standardizing processes within your organization will affect the quality of care on your unit because doing so meets the principles of high reliability: sensitivity to operations, reluctance to accept “simple” explanations for problems, preoccupation with failure, deference to expertise, and resiliency.1 These principles fall into two categories: anticipation and containment. First, let’s address the principles in the anticipation category. Sensitivity to operations means that operations are complex and dynamic. Consistent rounding on your unit gives you firsthand knowledge of challenges, opportunities, and best practices. Being transparent increases attention to patient care processes. For instance, you’re observing medication administration using a recently added bar code reader and you notice the nurse pulling the device’s cord due to its short length and dropping it as a result. You share the information with other leaders and it’s determined that this is a common issue; as a result, the bar code reader cords are replaced with longer ones. Reluctance to accept “simple” explanations for problems means to dig deep into answers by performing a root cause analysis. Continuing with our bar code reader example, you discover that a nurse makes a medication error. On your organization’s reporting tool, you document the “simple” explanation for the error: the unit was short staffed that shift. However, upon further review, the root cause was that the nurse overrode a process due to bar code reader failure, which contributed to the error. There was no record of the device being reported as defective or any attempt to obtain another bar code reader before administering the medication. Preoccupation with failure means that leaders are looking at how processes may break. Evaluating the good catches in your environment may lead to preventing future failures. Also, being thoughtful and observant of what’s working well assists in error prevention. Replicating what’s working well in other areas is essential for high-reliability organizations. Now, let’s review the principles in the containment category: deference to expertise and resiliency. A common misconception regarding deferring to an expert is that it’s based on seniority or positional hierarchy. In some cases, the process expert is the clinical nurse who performs the task daily. That’s why it’s important when changing products that we ask staff members to evaluate them. Another example is that employees who are new to your organization may communicate best practices from previous employers. As a leader, refrain from saying “I know” because this deters employees from sharing ideas that may lead to improvements. Resiliency is the ability to recover quickly in times of high stress, adapt well to change, keep focused, and learn from adversity. A clinical example of nursing resilience is during a code. Nurses stay focused in what may be a rapidly changing situation and rebound quickly afterward to care for the next patient. After the code, the team gathers to debrief and discuss what went well and what didn’t. The team learns from the situation and takes the new knowledge to future events. We can communicate the lessons from this event to others so that practice changes can be made. Resilience also indicates that your organization can find swift fixes to prevent errors. Enabling rapid cycle change assists with being highly reliable. As a leader, consider process standardization to be a positive step toward keeping your patients and staff safe. Your organization has observed failures or errors, which increases attention to processes (sensitivity of operations). In developing standardized processes, your organization has looked to data and root causes for future prevention (reluctance to accept “simple” explanations for problems). As a result, it has sought out best practices (deference to expertise) and examined good catches to implement changes to decrease the chance of future errors (preoccupation with failure). And learning the skills associated with the standardization will allow your staff members to grow and provide consistent care (resiliency). NM
追求高可靠性
在你的组织中标准化过程将影响你单位的护理质量,因为这样做符合高可靠性的原则:对操作的敏感性,不愿意接受对问题的“简单”解释,对失败的关注,对专业知识的尊重,以及弹性这些原则可分为两类:预期和遏制。首先,让我们谈谈预期类别中的原则。对操作的敏感性意味着操作是复杂的和动态的。在你的单位里持续的四舍五入会给你带来挑战、机遇和最佳实践的第一手知识。透明增加了对患者护理过程的关注。例如,您正在使用最近添加的条形码阅读器观察药物管理,并且您注意到护士因其长度短而拉设备的脐带并因此将其丢弃。你与其他领导人分享信息,确定这是一个共同的问题;结果,条形码读取线被更长的线所取代。不愿意接受对问题的“简单”解释意味着要通过执行根本原因分析来深入挖掘答案。继续我们的条形码阅读器示例,您将发现一名护士犯了用药错误。在组织的报告工具上,您记录了错误的“简单”解释:该单位在该班次缺少人员。然而,经过进一步审查,根本原因是由于条形码阅读器故障,护士重写了一个过程,这导致了错误。没有记录表明该设备有缺陷,也没有任何在用药前试图获得另一个条形码阅读器的记录。对失败的关注意味着领导者正在关注流程可能如何中断。在您的环境中评估好的捕获可能导致防止未来的失败。此外,对工作良好的地方进行深思熟虑和观察有助于预防错误。对于高可靠性组织来说,复制其他领域的成功经验至关重要。现在,让我们回顾一下遏制类别中的原则:尊重专业知识和弹性。关于听从专家的一个常见误解是,这是基于资历或职位等级。在某些情况下,流程专家是每天执行任务的临床护士。这就是为什么在更换产品时,我们要求员工对产品进行评估是很重要的。另一个例子是,新到公司的员工可能会与以前的雇主交流最佳做法。作为领导者,不要说“我知道”,因为这会阻止员工分享可能导致改进的想法。弹性是指在高压力下迅速恢复的能力,适应变化的能力,保持专注的能力,以及从逆境中学习的能力。护理弹性的一个临床例子是在代码期间。护士在可能迅速变化的情况下保持专注,并在之后迅速恢复过来照顾下一个病人。代码完成后,团队聚集在一起进行汇报,讨论哪些进展顺利,哪些不顺利。团队从这种情况中学习,并将新知识应用到未来的事件中。我们可以将这次事件的经验教训与他人交流,以便在实践中做出改变。弹性还表明您的组织可以找到快速修复以防止错误。支持快速周期变化有助于提高可靠性。作为领导者,应将流程标准化视为确保患者和员工安全的积极步骤。您的组织已经观察到失败或错误,这增加了对流程的关注(操作的敏感性)。在开发标准化过程中,您的组织已经着眼于数据和未来预防的根本原因(不愿意接受对问题的“简单”解释)。因此,它已经找到了最佳实践(对专业知识的尊重),并检查了实现更改的良好捕获,以减少未来错误的机会(专注于失败)。学习与标准化相关的技能将使您的员工成长并提供一致的护理(弹性)。纳米
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信