Building-up resilience and being effective leaders in the workplace: a systematic review and synthesis model

Meng Yu, Jie Wen, Simon M. Smith, Peter Stokes
{"title":"Building-up resilience and being effective leaders in the workplace: a systematic review and synthesis model","authors":"Meng Yu, Jie Wen, Simon M. Smith, Peter Stokes","doi":"10.1108/lodj-09-2021-0437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposePsychological resilience, defined here as the capacity to bounce back from adversity and failure, has been studied in various leadership contexts. However, the literature demonstrates less consensus concerning how psychological resilience manifests in, and interacts within, the leadership role and, equally, the focus on resilience development is underdeveloped. This paper addresses these issues by focusing on the interactions between psychological resilience and leadership and presents practical development strategies.Design/methodology/approachA systematic review employing 46 empirical studies followed a thematic synthesis within an associated model encapsulated as building-up resilience and being effective.FindingsFirst, resilience is identified as essential and can benefit individuals and organizations' work outcomes across leadership contexts, including work performance, job engagement, well-being, and enhanced leadership capability. Secondly, leaders may build up their resilience by obtaining coping skills and improved attitudes toward challenges. Resilient attitudes, which are presented as paradoxical perspectives towards challenges, may help leaders adapt to challenges and adversities leading to beneficial outcomes.Research limitations/implicationsEven though this study provides a deeper understanding of the essential function of psychological resilience in leadership, the findings are limited to the workplace contexts investigated, e.g. exploring small sample sizes (13,019) or country contexts (22). Future research could expand the rhetoric around interactions between psychological resilience and leadership. Furthermore, the underlining mechanism between the paradoxical perspective and resilient attitudes is still largely unclear. Thus, more research is needed to disclose the interaction of paradoxical perceptions and leadership resilience. Further research can investigate how resilient attitudes demonstrate in actions in dealing with challenges and adversities.Practical implicationsThe authors further an argument that leaders may enhance their resilience through embracing a paradoxical perspective towards challenges (resilient attitude), e.g. being adaptive to adversities, and the attitude of learning from failures. These enhanced resilient attitudes could help leaders deeper understand and examine their reality and persist under high pressures and develop an innate ability to utilise resources more effectively to help them survive and thrive in challenging circumstances, instead of becoming overwhelmed by the burden of complexity or giving up. This will offer a practical contribution to resilience development.Social implicationsImportantly, this study found that resilience is an essential leadership trait and can benefit individuals and organizations' work outcomes across leadership contexts. These positive effects of resilience may encourage organizations or society to promote psychological resilience, including a resilient attitude, to deal with adversities and uncertainties.Originality/valueFundamentally, the synthesized model applied may encourage further studies to focus on how to build up resilience and practically apply it in workplaces across leadership contexts. In particular, this study found that adopting paradoxical perspectives and ambidextrous leadership approaches toward adversities is an original resilience development strategy, which serves to contribute to the gap in the literature.","PeriodicalId":132021,"journal":{"name":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","volume":"213 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-09-2021-0437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

PurposePsychological resilience, defined here as the capacity to bounce back from adversity and failure, has been studied in various leadership contexts. However, the literature demonstrates less consensus concerning how psychological resilience manifests in, and interacts within, the leadership role and, equally, the focus on resilience development is underdeveloped. This paper addresses these issues by focusing on the interactions between psychological resilience and leadership and presents practical development strategies.Design/methodology/approachA systematic review employing 46 empirical studies followed a thematic synthesis within an associated model encapsulated as building-up resilience and being effective.FindingsFirst, resilience is identified as essential and can benefit individuals and organizations' work outcomes across leadership contexts, including work performance, job engagement, well-being, and enhanced leadership capability. Secondly, leaders may build up their resilience by obtaining coping skills and improved attitudes toward challenges. Resilient attitudes, which are presented as paradoxical perspectives towards challenges, may help leaders adapt to challenges and adversities leading to beneficial outcomes.Research limitations/implicationsEven though this study provides a deeper understanding of the essential function of psychological resilience in leadership, the findings are limited to the workplace contexts investigated, e.g. exploring small sample sizes (13,019) or country contexts (22). Future research could expand the rhetoric around interactions between psychological resilience and leadership. Furthermore, the underlining mechanism between the paradoxical perspective and resilient attitudes is still largely unclear. Thus, more research is needed to disclose the interaction of paradoxical perceptions and leadership resilience. Further research can investigate how resilient attitudes demonstrate in actions in dealing with challenges and adversities.Practical implicationsThe authors further an argument that leaders may enhance their resilience through embracing a paradoxical perspective towards challenges (resilient attitude), e.g. being adaptive to adversities, and the attitude of learning from failures. These enhanced resilient attitudes could help leaders deeper understand and examine their reality and persist under high pressures and develop an innate ability to utilise resources more effectively to help them survive and thrive in challenging circumstances, instead of becoming overwhelmed by the burden of complexity or giving up. This will offer a practical contribution to resilience development.Social implicationsImportantly, this study found that resilience is an essential leadership trait and can benefit individuals and organizations' work outcomes across leadership contexts. These positive effects of resilience may encourage organizations or society to promote psychological resilience, including a resilient attitude, to deal with adversities and uncertainties.Originality/valueFundamentally, the synthesized model applied may encourage further studies to focus on how to build up resilience and practically apply it in workplaces across leadership contexts. In particular, this study found that adopting paradoxical perspectives and ambidextrous leadership approaches toward adversities is an original resilience development strategy, which serves to contribute to the gap in the literature.
在工作场所建立弹性和成为有效的领导者:一个系统的回顾和综合模型
目的心理弹性,这里定义为从逆境和失败中恢复过来的能力,已经在各种领导环境中进行了研究。然而,关于心理弹性如何在领导角色中表现和相互作用,文献表明共识较少,同样,对弹性发展的关注也不发达。本文通过关注心理弹性与领导力之间的相互作用来解决这些问题,并提出实用的发展策略。设计/方法/方法采用46项实证研究进行系统审查,随后在相关模型中进行主题综合,封装为建立弹性和有效。首先,弹性被认为是必不可少的,它可以在领导环境中有益于个人和组织的工作成果,包括工作绩效、工作投入、幸福感和增强的领导能力。其次,领导者可以通过获得应对技能和改善对挑战的态度来建立他们的弹性。弹性态度,表现为对挑战的矛盾观点,可以帮助领导者适应挑战和逆境,从而产生有益的结果。虽然这项研究提供了对心理弹性在领导力中的基本功能的更深入的理解,但研究结果仅限于所调查的工作场所背景,例如探索小样本量(13019)或国家背景(22)。未来的研究可能会扩大关于心理弹性和领导力之间相互作用的修辞。此外,矛盾的观点和弹性态度之间的主要机制在很大程度上仍然不清楚。因此,需要更多的研究来揭示悖论认知与领导韧性之间的相互作用。进一步的研究可以调查弹性态度如何在应对挑战和逆境的行动中表现出来。实际意义作者进一步提出,领导者可以通过对挑战采取矛盾的观点(弹性态度)来增强他们的弹性,例如适应逆境,从失败中学习的态度。这些增强的弹性态度可以帮助领导者更深入地理解和审视他们的现实,在高压下坚持下去,并培养一种更有效地利用资源的天生能力,帮助他们在充满挑战的环境中生存和发展,而不是被复杂的负担所压倒或放弃。这将为弹性发展作出实际贡献。重要的是,本研究发现弹性是一种重要的领导特质,可以在领导环境中有益于个人和组织的工作成果。弹性的这些积极影响可以鼓励组织或社会促进心理弹性,包括弹性态度,以应对逆境和不确定性。从根本上说,所应用的综合模型可能会鼓励进一步的研究,关注如何建立弹性,并在跨领导环境的工作场所实际应用它。特别是,本研究发现,在逆境中采用悖论视角和双灵巧领导方法是一种原始的弹性发展策略,这有助于促进文献的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信