To the Question of the Classification for Analytical Surfaces

Stanislav Strashnov, M. Rynkovskaya
{"title":"To the Question of the Classification for Analytical Surfaces","authors":"Stanislav Strashnov, M. Rynkovskaya","doi":"10.12737/2308-4898-2022-10-1-36-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Until this day, in scientific and technical literature there are descriptions of around 600 analytical surfaces, divided into 38 classes. In turn, it is possible to divide almost each class of surfaces into sub-classes, groups, or types, that is, to compose a classification for surfaces. It will make it easier their further study. For some classes of surfaces there is no sense to set up classification schemes, since these classes consist of a small number of surfaces, or the classification will contain a bare listing of surfaces. These surfaces can include minimal and one-sided surfaces, spiral and helical ones, surfaces of Ciceika and Edlinger, as well as undulating, wavy and corrugated surfaces, and several others. The \"others\" category includes surfaces which, although highlighted in separate classes, are few, or they are in the process of studying. The study of scientific literature has shown that a classification for revolution surfaces, as well as for transfer and Peterson ones has not yet been set up. This paper is devoted to these classes of analytical surfaces. As the study has showed, it is possible to draw interesting conclusions based on presented classifications. In this paper it has been shown how the appearance of scientific publications devoted to classification for surfaces promote the emergence of numerous works on application of relevant surfaces in architecture, construction, engineering, shipbuilding, light industry products, topography and cartography. But devotion to analytic surfaces’ geometric forms should not be an end in itself in actual practice. So, today architects are passionate about parametric architecture, which is based on knowledge of analytical surfaces’ geometry. However, some leading architects believe that the parametric architecture oversaturated the human life’s space, resulting in a style crisis. Despite architects and engineers’ conflicting opinions, geometers must go ahead of society's immediate demands, creating new forms, classifications, and proposals.","PeriodicalId":426623,"journal":{"name":"Geometry & Graphics","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geometry & Graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12737/2308-4898-2022-10-1-36-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Until this day, in scientific and technical literature there are descriptions of around 600 analytical surfaces, divided into 38 classes. In turn, it is possible to divide almost each class of surfaces into sub-classes, groups, or types, that is, to compose a classification for surfaces. It will make it easier their further study. For some classes of surfaces there is no sense to set up classification schemes, since these classes consist of a small number of surfaces, or the classification will contain a bare listing of surfaces. These surfaces can include minimal and one-sided surfaces, spiral and helical ones, surfaces of Ciceika and Edlinger, as well as undulating, wavy and corrugated surfaces, and several others. The "others" category includes surfaces which, although highlighted in separate classes, are few, or they are in the process of studying. The study of scientific literature has shown that a classification for revolution surfaces, as well as for transfer and Peterson ones has not yet been set up. This paper is devoted to these classes of analytical surfaces. As the study has showed, it is possible to draw interesting conclusions based on presented classifications. In this paper it has been shown how the appearance of scientific publications devoted to classification for surfaces promote the emergence of numerous works on application of relevant surfaces in architecture, construction, engineering, shipbuilding, light industry products, topography and cartography. But devotion to analytic surfaces’ geometric forms should not be an end in itself in actual practice. So, today architects are passionate about parametric architecture, which is based on knowledge of analytical surfaces’ geometry. However, some leading architects believe that the parametric architecture oversaturated the human life’s space, resulting in a style crisis. Despite architects and engineers’ conflicting opinions, geometers must go ahead of society's immediate demands, creating new forms, classifications, and proposals.
解析曲面的分类问题
直到今天,在科学和技术文献中有大约600个分析表面的描述,分为38类。反过来,几乎可以将每一类表面划分为子类、组或类型,也就是说,可以对表面进行分类。这将使他们的进一步学习更容易。对于某些类别的表面,没有必要建立分类方案,因为这些类别由少量表面组成,或者分类将包含一个表面列表。这些表面可以包括极小面和单面,螺旋面和螺旋面,Ciceika和Edlinger的表面,以及起伏面,波浪面和波纹面等等。“其他”类别包括虽然在单独的班级中突出显示,但很少的表面,或者正在学习的表面。对科学文献的研究表明,对旋转表面、转移表面和彼得森表面的分类尚未建立。本文专门讨论这类解析曲面。正如这项研究所表明的那样,根据所提出的分类,有可能得出有趣的结论。在本文中,它已经显示了科学出版物的出现是如何致力于表面分类促进了在建筑、建筑、工程、造船、轻工业产品、地形学和制图中应用相关表面的大量作品的出现。但是,在实际应用中,对解析曲面几何形式的研究本身不应成为目的。因此,今天的建筑师对参数化建筑充满热情,这是基于解析曲面几何知识的。然而,一些著名的建筑师认为,参数化建筑过度饱和了人类的生活空间,导致了风格危机。尽管建筑师和工程师的观点相互矛盾,但几何学家必须走在社会直接需求的前面,创造新的形式、分类和方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信