Risk Assessment Methodology to Support Shutdown Plant Decision

E. Calixto, C. D. Moraes, Cid Atusi Outi, W. D. Santos
{"title":"Risk Assessment Methodology to Support Shutdown Plant Decision","authors":"E. Calixto, C. D. Moraes, Cid Atusi Outi, W. D. Santos","doi":"10.4236/OJSST.2013.34015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays one of the most important decisions in safety issues in \nBrazilian Oil and Gas industry is that it’s necessary to shut down \nplant because one specific failure or required maintenance in protection system makes influence on risk level. Most of time, experienced operators make decisions based on their background despite carrying out a risk analysis to support \ntheir decision. Therefore in so many cases, refinery plants work on \ncatastrophic risk level due to subjective decisions. In order to \nimprove the operator decision, a specific methodology was established to apply \nrisk assessment using PRA (Preliminary Risk Analysis), LOPA (Layer of \nProtection Analysis) and FTA (Fault Tree Analysis) in order to check risk level \nor layer of protection availability. By this way, as the first step, the \nPreliminary Risk Analysis will be carried out in order to qualify risk and \nmainly define consequences severity. The second step will carry out the LOPA in \norder to find out the failure probability of all layers of protection and \nwithout one of those layers of protection which requires maintenance or \neven failure. In addition, when is necessary to check that contingency \nsystems availability FTA will be carried out? In the first \ncase, it is possible to substitute the layer of protection for another in order to keep risk on acceptable level. In the second case, it is necessary to \ncheck if contingency system is available and assess if consequence gets worse \nor keeps on the same level. In both cases, the final risk will be assessed \nand compared with the previous one defined on PRA. In case of risk, it is \nunacceptable that the final decision will shut down plant. The \nrefinery study case will be shown as an instance of such methodology.","PeriodicalId":183634,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology","volume":"258 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJSST.2013.34015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Nowadays one of the most important decisions in safety issues in Brazilian Oil and Gas industry is that it’s necessary to shut down plant because one specific failure or required maintenance in protection system makes influence on risk level. Most of time, experienced operators make decisions based on their background despite carrying out a risk analysis to support their decision. Therefore in so many cases, refinery plants work on catastrophic risk level due to subjective decisions. In order to improve the operator decision, a specific methodology was established to apply risk assessment using PRA (Preliminary Risk Analysis), LOPA (Layer of Protection Analysis) and FTA (Fault Tree Analysis) in order to check risk level or layer of protection availability. By this way, as the first step, the Preliminary Risk Analysis will be carried out in order to qualify risk and mainly define consequences severity. The second step will carry out the LOPA in order to find out the failure probability of all layers of protection and without one of those layers of protection which requires maintenance or even failure. In addition, when is necessary to check that contingency systems availability FTA will be carried out? In the first case, it is possible to substitute the layer of protection for another in order to keep risk on acceptable level. In the second case, it is necessary to check if contingency system is available and assess if consequence gets worse or keeps on the same level. In both cases, the final risk will be assessed and compared with the previous one defined on PRA. In case of risk, it is unacceptable that the final decision will shut down plant. The refinery study case will be shown as an instance of such methodology.
支持关闭工厂决策的风险评估方法
目前,巴西油气行业安全问题中最重要的决策之一是,由于保护系统的某个特定故障或需要维护,会对风险水平产生影响,因此有必要关闭工厂。大多数情况下,经验丰富的作业者根据自己的背景做出决策,尽管他们会进行风险分析来支持他们的决策。因此,在很多情况下,由于主观决定,炼油厂的工作处于灾难性的风险水平。为了改善运营商的决策,建立了一种具体的方法来应用风险评估,使用PRA(初步风险分析)、LOPA(保护层分析)和FTA(故障树分析)来检查风险级别或保护层的可用性。通过这种方式,作为第一步,将进行初步风险分析,以确定风险的资格,并主要确定后果的严重性。第二步将进行LOPA,以找出所有保护层的失效概率,以及不需要维护甚至失效的保护层。另外,什么时候需要检查应急系统的可用性FTA ?在第一种情况下,为了将风险保持在可接受的水平上,可以用另一层保护层代替另一层保护层。在第二种情况下,有必要检查应急系统是否可用,并评估后果是否恶化或保持在同一水平。在这两种情况下,将评估最终风险,并与PRA中定义的先前风险进行比较。在危险的情况下,最终决定关闭工厂是不可接受的。炼油厂研究案例将作为这种方法的一个实例来展示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信