Nontraumatic vs. Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Rehabilitation Outcome Comparison

W. Mckinley, R. Seel, Ramakrishna K. Gadi, Michael A. Tewksbury
{"title":"Nontraumatic vs. Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Rehabilitation Outcome Comparison","authors":"W. Mckinley, R. Seel, Ramakrishna K. Gadi, Michael A. Tewksbury","doi":"10.1097/00002060-200109000-00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"McKinley WO, Seel RT, Gadi RK, Tewksbury MA: Nontraumatic vs. traumatic spinal cord injury: a rehabilitation outcome comparison. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:693–699. Objective: Nontraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) represents a significant proportion of individuals admitted for SCI rehabilitation; however, there is limited literature regarding their outcomes. As our society continues to age and nontraumatic injuries present with greater frequency, further studies in this area will become increasingly relevant. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of patients with nontraumatic SCI with those with traumatic SCI after inpatient rehabilitation. Design: A longitudinal study with matched block design was used comparing 86 patients with nontraumatic SCI admitted to a SCI rehabilitation unit and 86 patients with traumatic SCI admitted to regional model SCI centers, controlling for age, neurologic level of injury, and American Spinal Injury Association impairment classification. Main outcome measures included acute and rehabilitation hospital length of stay, FIMTM scores, FIM change, FIM efficiency, rehabilitation charges, and discharge-to-home rates. Results: Results indicate that when compared with traumatic SCI, patients with nontraumatic SCI had a significantly (P < 0.01) shorter rehabilitation length of stay (22.38 vs. 41.35 days) and lower discharge FIM scores (57.3 vs. 65.6), FIM change (18.6 vs. 31.0), and rehabilitation charges ($25,050 vs. $64,570). No statistical differences were found in acute care length of stay, admission FIM scores, FIM efficiency, and community discharge rates. Conclusions: The findings indicate that patients with nontraumatic SCI can achieve rates of functional gains and community discharge comparable with traumatic SCI. Whereas patients with traumatic SCI achieved greater overall functional improvement, patients with nontraumatic SCI had shorter rehabilitation length of stay and lower rehabilitation charges. These findings have important implications for the interdisciplinary rehabilitation process in the overall management and outcome of individuals with nontraumatic SCI.","PeriodicalId":375748,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"107","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200109000-00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 107

Abstract

McKinley WO, Seel RT, Gadi RK, Tewksbury MA: Nontraumatic vs. traumatic spinal cord injury: a rehabilitation outcome comparison. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:693–699. Objective: Nontraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) represents a significant proportion of individuals admitted for SCI rehabilitation; however, there is limited literature regarding their outcomes. As our society continues to age and nontraumatic injuries present with greater frequency, further studies in this area will become increasingly relevant. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of patients with nontraumatic SCI with those with traumatic SCI after inpatient rehabilitation. Design: A longitudinal study with matched block design was used comparing 86 patients with nontraumatic SCI admitted to a SCI rehabilitation unit and 86 patients with traumatic SCI admitted to regional model SCI centers, controlling for age, neurologic level of injury, and American Spinal Injury Association impairment classification. Main outcome measures included acute and rehabilitation hospital length of stay, FIMTM scores, FIM change, FIM efficiency, rehabilitation charges, and discharge-to-home rates. Results: Results indicate that when compared with traumatic SCI, patients with nontraumatic SCI had a significantly (P < 0.01) shorter rehabilitation length of stay (22.38 vs. 41.35 days) and lower discharge FIM scores (57.3 vs. 65.6), FIM change (18.6 vs. 31.0), and rehabilitation charges ($25,050 vs. $64,570). No statistical differences were found in acute care length of stay, admission FIM scores, FIM efficiency, and community discharge rates. Conclusions: The findings indicate that patients with nontraumatic SCI can achieve rates of functional gains and community discharge comparable with traumatic SCI. Whereas patients with traumatic SCI achieved greater overall functional improvement, patients with nontraumatic SCI had shorter rehabilitation length of stay and lower rehabilitation charges. These findings have important implications for the interdisciplinary rehabilitation process in the overall management and outcome of individuals with nontraumatic SCI.
非创伤性与创伤性脊髓损伤:康复结果比较
mcmckinley WO, Seel RT, Gadi RK, Tewksbury MA:非创伤性与创伤性脊髓损伤:康复结果比较。[J]中华医学杂志,2001;19(2):391 - 391。目的:非创伤性脊髓损伤(SCI)在接受SCI康复治疗的个体中占很大比例;然而,关于其结果的文献有限。随着我们社会的持续老龄化和非创伤性损伤出现的频率越来越高,这一领域的进一步研究将变得越来越重要。本研究的目的是比较非创伤性脊髓损伤患者和创伤性脊髓损伤患者住院康复后的预后。设计:采用匹配块设计的纵向研究,比较86例住进脊髓损伤康复中心的非外伤性脊髓损伤患者和86例住进区域模型脊髓损伤中心的外伤性脊髓损伤患者,控制年龄、损伤的神经系统水平和美国脊髓损伤协会的损伤分类。主要结局指标包括急性和康复住院时间、FIM评分、FIM变化、FIM效率、康复费用和出院回家率。结果:结果表明,与创伤性脊髓损伤患者相比,非创伤性脊髓损伤患者的康复住院时间(22.38天比41.35天)明显缩短(P < 0.01),出院FIM评分(57.3比65.6),FIM变化(18.6比31.0)和康复费用(25,050美元比64,570美元)较低。在急症护理住院时间、入院FIM评分、FIM效率和社区出院率方面均无统计学差异。结论:研究结果表明,与外伤性脊髓损伤相比,非外伤性脊髓损伤患者的功能恢复和社区出院率可达到相当的水平。创伤性脊髓损伤患者获得了更大的整体功能改善,而非创伤性脊髓损伤患者的康复时间更短,康复费用更低。这些发现对非创伤性脊髓损伤患者的综合管理和预后的跨学科康复过程具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信