ANESTHETIC PROPERTIES OF PROPOFOL AND KETOFOL (KETAMINE WITH PROPOFOL): A COMPARATIVE STUDY

R. Yadav, A. Thapa, Rakesh Sah, H. Upadhyay
{"title":"ANESTHETIC PROPERTIES OF PROPOFOL AND KETOFOL (KETAMINE WITH PROPOFOL): A COMPARATIVE STUDY","authors":"R. Yadav, A. Thapa, Rakesh Sah, H. Upadhyay","doi":"10.54530/jcmc.1196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Surgical procedures require a safe anesthesia and safe anesthetic agents for this purpose use of small dose of sedative agent or any other anesthetic agent in order to reduce the dose requirement as well as adverse effects of the main inducing agent.  Therefore, this study was carried out using ketamine with propofol (KETOFOL) to compare the hemodynamic stability (Heart rate and Mean arterial pressure) and induction doses.\nMethods: Fifty patients of age 18 to 60 years of ASA II and I scheduled for elective surgery to be performed under general anaesthesia were randomly selected and divided into two groups. Patient in Group-P received 50 mg propofol and Group-K received 50 mg (25mg ketamine with 25 mg propofol) intravenously bolus slowly and then 10 mg in every 10 seconds until the loss of eyelash reflex and verbal response. The hemodynamic response was noted at different given time. Chi square test and student’s t test were used for analysis.\nResults: The study showed that the hemodynamic (heart rate and mean arterial pressure) was maintained and decrease in dose requirement for propofol for induction in (ketamine with propofol Ketofol group whereas there was significant decrease in hemodynamic (heart rate and mean arterial pressure) in Propofol group.\nConclusions: Our study concluded that fluctuations in heart rate and mean arterial pressure from baseline were more in propofol group compared to ketofol (ketamine with propofol) group. Therefore, Ketofol achieved better hemodynamic stability over propofol alone and also induction dose of propofol was reduced.","PeriodicalId":265624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chitwan Medical College","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chitwan Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54530/jcmc.1196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical procedures require a safe anesthesia and safe anesthetic agents for this purpose use of small dose of sedative agent or any other anesthetic agent in order to reduce the dose requirement as well as adverse effects of the main inducing agent.  Therefore, this study was carried out using ketamine with propofol (KETOFOL) to compare the hemodynamic stability (Heart rate and Mean arterial pressure) and induction doses. Methods: Fifty patients of age 18 to 60 years of ASA II and I scheduled for elective surgery to be performed under general anaesthesia were randomly selected and divided into two groups. Patient in Group-P received 50 mg propofol and Group-K received 50 mg (25mg ketamine with 25 mg propofol) intravenously bolus slowly and then 10 mg in every 10 seconds until the loss of eyelash reflex and verbal response. The hemodynamic response was noted at different given time. Chi square test and student’s t test were used for analysis. Results: The study showed that the hemodynamic (heart rate and mean arterial pressure) was maintained and decrease in dose requirement for propofol for induction in (ketamine with propofol Ketofol group whereas there was significant decrease in hemodynamic (heart rate and mean arterial pressure) in Propofol group. Conclusions: Our study concluded that fluctuations in heart rate and mean arterial pressure from baseline were more in propofol group compared to ketofol (ketamine with propofol) group. Therefore, Ketofol achieved better hemodynamic stability over propofol alone and also induction dose of propofol was reduced.
异丙酚和酮酚(氯胺酮与异丙酚)麻醉特性的比较研究
背景:外科手术需要安全的麻醉和安全的麻醉剂,使用小剂量的镇静剂或任何其他麻醉剂,以减少剂量要求和主要诱导剂的不良反应。因此,本研究使用氯胺酮与异丙酚(KETOFOL)比较血流动力学稳定性(心率和平均动脉压)和诱导剂量。方法:随机选择50例年龄在18 ~ 60岁,拟在全身麻醉下择期行ASA II、I级手术的患者,分为两组。p组患者静脉滴注异丙酚50 mg, k组患者静脉滴注50 mg(氯胺酮25mg +异丙酚25mg),缓慢滴注后每10秒滴注10 mg,直至睫毛反射和言语反应消失。观察不同给定时间的血流动力学反应。采用卡方检验和学生t检验进行分析。结果:氯胺酮与异丙酚酮酚组血流动力学(心率和平均动脉压)维持正常,异丙酚诱导剂量要求降低,而异丙酚组血流动力学(心率和平均动脉压)明显降低。结论:我们的研究得出结论,与酮酚(氯胺酮与异丙酚)组相比,异丙酚组心率和平均动脉压的基线波动更大。因此,与单独使用异丙酚相比,酮酚具有更好的血流动力学稳定性,并且减少了异丙酚的诱导剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信