Chapter 10 Scholarly Practice and Meaningful Research: Utilising Voice by Enabling Action … if it was only that Simple!

D. Higgins, S. Smith
{"title":"Chapter 10 Scholarly Practice and Meaningful Research: Utilising Voice by Enabling Action … if it was only that Simple!","authors":"D. Higgins, S. Smith","doi":"10.1108/S2040-72462018000009A010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThe growing importance of ‘lived practices’ in entrepreneurship-related studies has sought to pose several questions and challenges for researchers/scholars in the field (Ruona & Gilley, 2009; Short, Keefer, & Stone, 2009). The issue of how current entrepreneurship research practices can become more applied in nature provides the basis for articulating more clearly what we mean by research impact and why it has become a central concern in the research field (Beyer & Trice, 1982; Huggins et al., 2008; Rynes, 2007; Starkey & Tempest, 2005). This debate has drawn specific attention to the need for applied research in entrepreneurial scholarship, which is more reflective of lived practice. The need to reach a balance between practitioners and academics’ expectations in terms of delivering research which is focussed towards achieving academic rigour and application to practice, which is both meaningful and relatable, is significant for both communities (Ram, Edwards, Jones, Kiselinchev, & Muchenje, 2017). This chapter seeks to assist and inspire both existing and future researchers in the field to make more informed choices and offer tangible evidence of good practice, serving as a guide to researchers wishing to develop engaged research. The authors hope that the nature of this chapter would seek to clarify the importance of engaged research in supporting how we understand and respond to the needs of entrepreneurial practice as a means of building trust and confidence in research reported. A key characteristic of the issue will be the different ‘framing’ of questions that can enhance practical knowledge.","PeriodicalId":278492,"journal":{"name":"Creating Entrepreneurial Space: Talking Through Multi-Voices, Reflections on Emerging Debates","volume":"13 1-4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creating Entrepreneurial Space: Talking Through Multi-Voices, Reflections on Emerging Debates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S2040-72462018000009A010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The growing importance of ‘lived practices’ in entrepreneurship-related studies has sought to pose several questions and challenges for researchers/scholars in the field (Ruona & Gilley, 2009; Short, Keefer, & Stone, 2009). The issue of how current entrepreneurship research practices can become more applied in nature provides the basis for articulating more clearly what we mean by research impact and why it has become a central concern in the research field (Beyer & Trice, 1982; Huggins et al., 2008; Rynes, 2007; Starkey & Tempest, 2005). This debate has drawn specific attention to the need for applied research in entrepreneurial scholarship, which is more reflective of lived practice. The need to reach a balance between practitioners and academics’ expectations in terms of delivering research which is focussed towards achieving academic rigour and application to practice, which is both meaningful and relatable, is significant for both communities (Ram, Edwards, Jones, Kiselinchev, & Muchenje, 2017). This chapter seeks to assist and inspire both existing and future researchers in the field to make more informed choices and offer tangible evidence of good practice, serving as a guide to researchers wishing to develop engaged research. The authors hope that the nature of this chapter would seek to clarify the importance of engaged research in supporting how we understand and respond to the needs of entrepreneurial practice as a means of building trust and confidence in research reported. A key characteristic of the issue will be the different ‘framing’ of questions that can enhance practical knowledge.
第10章学术实践和有意义的研究:通过推动行动来利用声音……如果它只是那么简单!
“生活实践”在创业相关研究中的重要性日益增加,这给该领域的研究人员/学者提出了几个问题和挑战(Ruona & Gilley, 2009;Short, Keefer, & Stone, 2009)。当前的创业研究实践如何在本质上得到更多的应用,这一问题为更清楚地阐明我们所说的研究影响的含义以及为什么它已成为研究领域的核心关注提供了基础(Beyer & Trice, 1982;Huggins et al., 2008;Rynes, 2007;Starkey & Tempest, 2005)。这场辩论引起了人们对创业学术应用研究必要性的特别关注,因为应用研究更能反映生活实践。在提供专注于实现学术严密性和应用于实践的研究方面,从业者和学者的期望之间需要达到平衡,这既有意义又相关,对两个社区都很重要(Ram, Edwards, Jones, Kiselinchev, & Muchenje, 2017)。本章旨在帮助和激励该领域现有和未来的研究人员做出更明智的选择,并提供良好实践的切实证据,作为希望开展参与式研究的研究人员的指南。作者希望本章的本质将试图澄清参与研究的重要性,以支持我们如何理解和响应创业实践的需求,作为在研究报告中建立信任和信心的一种手段。这个问题的一个关键特征是问题的不同“框架”,可以增强实践知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信