Suitability of Fumed Lead Blast-Furnace Slag as a Mineral Admixture for Concrete

D. L. Thomas, Mda Thomas, J. Ryell
{"title":"Suitability of Fumed Lead Blast-Furnace Slag as a Mineral Admixture for Concrete","authors":"D. L. Thomas, Mda Thomas, J. Ryell","doi":"10.14359/6022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports the findings from a laboratory evaluation of a metallurgical slag as a pozzolanic admixture for concrete. Lead blast-furnace slag is fumed in a batch process to remove base metal values after which the molten barren slag is water-quenched to produce a glassy, granular product. Chemical analysis shows the principal components of the slag to be silica, iron and calcium with lesser amounts of alumina, zinc and copper. Semi-quantitative x-ray diffraction analysis revealed the slag to be largely amorphous (>60% glass), the crystalline phases being apparently confined to mineral varieties of iron oxide and cuprite. The slag was ground to produce three samples with different Blaine fineness values and tested for compliance with the Canadian Standard for Supplementary Cementing Materials (CSA A23.5). The effect of the slag on a range of fresh and hardened concrete properties was then determined. Concrete mixtures were also cast using commercially available fly ash from a sub-bituminous coal source in Western Canada for comparison. The slag meets all the requirements of Type N, F and C materials and failed only the 45-microns sieve retention maximum of Type G. The results of concrete tests (setting time, compressive strength development, drying shrinkage and rapid chloride permeability) are very encouraging. The incorporation of slag slightly retarded the early strength gain of concrete, but after 28 days the strength of the slag concrete exceeded that of the control concretes of the same W/CM, regardless of the level of slag (in the range 20 to 40%). The strength of slag concrete was higher than that of concrete containing the same level of fly ash and the same W/CM at all ages. The coulomb ratings of the concretes containing slag were lower than those obtained on equivalent control concretes but were higher than those of the fly ash concretes. The results from these preliminary tests indicate that the lead blast-furnace slag is suitable as a pozzolanic admixture for concrete.","PeriodicalId":425482,"journal":{"name":"\"SP-178: Sixth CANMET/ACI/JCI Conference: FLy Ash, Silica Fume, Slag & Natural Pozzolans in Concrete\"","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"\"SP-178: Sixth CANMET/ACI/JCI Conference: FLy Ash, Silica Fume, Slag & Natural Pozzolans in Concrete\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14359/6022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper reports the findings from a laboratory evaluation of a metallurgical slag as a pozzolanic admixture for concrete. Lead blast-furnace slag is fumed in a batch process to remove base metal values after which the molten barren slag is water-quenched to produce a glassy, granular product. Chemical analysis shows the principal components of the slag to be silica, iron and calcium with lesser amounts of alumina, zinc and copper. Semi-quantitative x-ray diffraction analysis revealed the slag to be largely amorphous (>60% glass), the crystalline phases being apparently confined to mineral varieties of iron oxide and cuprite. The slag was ground to produce three samples with different Blaine fineness values and tested for compliance with the Canadian Standard for Supplementary Cementing Materials (CSA A23.5). The effect of the slag on a range of fresh and hardened concrete properties was then determined. Concrete mixtures were also cast using commercially available fly ash from a sub-bituminous coal source in Western Canada for comparison. The slag meets all the requirements of Type N, F and C materials and failed only the 45-microns sieve retention maximum of Type G. The results of concrete tests (setting time, compressive strength development, drying shrinkage and rapid chloride permeability) are very encouraging. The incorporation of slag slightly retarded the early strength gain of concrete, but after 28 days the strength of the slag concrete exceeded that of the control concretes of the same W/CM, regardless of the level of slag (in the range 20 to 40%). The strength of slag concrete was higher than that of concrete containing the same level of fly ash and the same W/CM at all ages. The coulomb ratings of the concretes containing slag were lower than those obtained on equivalent control concretes but were higher than those of the fly ash concretes. The results from these preliminary tests indicate that the lead blast-furnace slag is suitable as a pozzolanic admixture for concrete.
铅渣作为混凝土掺合料的适宜性
本文报道了一种冶金渣作为火山灰混凝土掺合料的实验室评价结果。铅鼓风炉炉渣在间歇过程中被烟熏以去除贱金属值,然后熔融的贫渣被水淬以产生玻璃状的颗粒状产品。化学分析表明,渣的主要成分是二氧化硅、铁和钙,还有少量的氧化铝、锌和铜。半定量x射线衍射分析表明,渣主要为非晶态(>60%为玻璃),晶相明显局限于氧化铁和铜的矿物品种。将矿渣研磨成三种不同Blaine细度值的样品,并测试其是否符合加拿大补充胶结材料标准(CSA A23.5)。然后确定了矿渣对一系列新拌和硬化混凝土性能的影响。为了进行比较,还使用加拿大西部一种亚烟煤的市售粉煤灰浇铸混凝土混合物。该渣满足N、F、C类材料的全部要求,仅g类材料的最大截留量为45 μ m,混凝土的凝结时间、抗压强度发展、干燥收缩率和快速氯离子渗透性试验结果令人鼓舞。矿渣掺入对混凝土的早期强度增长略有延缓,但在28天后,矿渣混凝土的强度超过了相同W/CM的对照混凝土,无论矿渣掺入水平如何(在20% ~ 40%范围内)。矿渣混凝土在各龄期的强度均高于相同粉煤灰掺量和相同W/CM的混凝土。掺渣混凝土的库仑额定值低于同等对照混凝土,但高于粉煤灰混凝土。初步试验结果表明,铅高炉渣适合作为混凝土的火山灰掺合料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信