{"title":"“Less Abortion, More Adoption”: A Brief Discursive History of Adoption as Solution","authors":"S. Idzik","doi":"10.1353/ado.0.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Popular discourse around the Dobbs v. Jackson’s Women’s Health Organization decision framed adoption as an equivalent solution to abortion for the problem of unwanted pregnancies. Proposing adoption as a simple solution to a complex social or political problem is not new, and this article traces a lineage of such arguments, noting the ways that they marginalize both adoptees and birth families.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"31 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.0.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Popular discourse around the Dobbs v. Jackson’s Women’s Health Organization decision framed adoption as an equivalent solution to abortion for the problem of unwanted pregnancies. Proposing adoption as a simple solution to a complex social or political problem is not new, and this article traces a lineage of such arguments, noting the ways that they marginalize both adoptees and birth families.
围绕多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织(Dobbs v. Jackson’s Women’s Health Organization)一案的流行讨论,将收养视为解决意外怀孕问题的一种与堕胎同等的解决方案。将收养作为复杂社会或政治问题的简单解决方案并不新鲜,本文追溯了此类论点的沿路,指出了它们将被收养者和生身家庭都边缘化的方式。