A. Rasulov, Z. Rasulov, J. Madyarov, A. E. Kulikov, Y. Stoyko, A. Maksimenkov, A. Botov, Sh. A. Alishikhov, Yu. E. Lʼvova, A. Otabekov
{"title":"Does the level of medical facility impact short-term results of surgical treatment of colorectal cancer","authors":"A. Rasulov, Z. Rasulov, J. Madyarov, A. E. Kulikov, Y. Stoyko, A. Maksimenkov, A. Botov, Sh. A. Alishikhov, Yu. E. Lʼvova, A. Otabekov","doi":"10.17650/2782-3202-2022-2-1-39-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study objective was to evaluate the impact of medical hospital volume on short-term colorectal cancer treatment results.Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 93 patients with colorectal cancer operated on by one surgeon at two medical centers in Moscow from 2018 to 2020: 32 patients of the first group were operated in tertiary medical center (N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center) and 61 of the second group – in regional low volume hospital (Centrosoyuz Hospital). The endpoints of the study were the short-term outcomes: surgery duration, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, intra- and postoperative complications, lymph node harvested and the quality of specimen.Results. Surgery duration as well as blood loss in two groups were similar (258 min vs 240 min, p = 0.47 and 100 ml and 100 ml, p = 0.89, accordingly). Hospital stay after surgery was significantly less in the first group (9 days vs 16 days, p <0.01). The frequency of postoperative complications of type I–II according to the Clavien–Dindo classification was higher in the first group (6/8 vs 1/8, p <0.05) but reoperations performed more in the second group due to III Clavien–Dindo complications (2/8 vs 7/8, p = 0.012). Grade 2–3 rectal cancer specimen quality was 94.7 % vs 77.8 %, p = 0.13 and harvested lymph nodes >12 was 71.9 % vs 78.7 %, p = 0.485 in first and second group, respectively.Conclusion. Hospital volume does not affect rectal cancer specimen quality, surgery duration and blood loss, if the surgical interventions are performed by one experienced surgeon but associated with the incidence of postoperative complications and the length of stay.","PeriodicalId":318498,"journal":{"name":"MD-Onco","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MD-Onco","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/2782-3202-2022-2-1-39-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study objective was to evaluate the impact of medical hospital volume on short-term colorectal cancer treatment results.Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 93 patients with colorectal cancer operated on by one surgeon at two medical centers in Moscow from 2018 to 2020: 32 patients of the first group were operated in tertiary medical center (N.I. Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center) and 61 of the second group – in regional low volume hospital (Centrosoyuz Hospital). The endpoints of the study were the short-term outcomes: surgery duration, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, intra- and postoperative complications, lymph node harvested and the quality of specimen.Results. Surgery duration as well as blood loss in two groups were similar (258 min vs 240 min, p = 0.47 and 100 ml and 100 ml, p = 0.89, accordingly). Hospital stay after surgery was significantly less in the first group (9 days vs 16 days, p <0.01). The frequency of postoperative complications of type I–II according to the Clavien–Dindo classification was higher in the first group (6/8 vs 1/8, p <0.05) but reoperations performed more in the second group due to III Clavien–Dindo complications (2/8 vs 7/8, p = 0.012). Grade 2–3 rectal cancer specimen quality was 94.7 % vs 77.8 %, p = 0.13 and harvested lymph nodes >12 was 71.9 % vs 78.7 %, p = 0.485 in first and second group, respectively.Conclusion. Hospital volume does not affect rectal cancer specimen quality, surgery duration and blood loss, if the surgical interventions are performed by one experienced surgeon but associated with the incidence of postoperative complications and the length of stay.
本研究的目的是评价医院容积对结直肠癌短期治疗效果的影响。材料和方法。回顾性研究包括2018年至2020年在莫斯科两家医疗中心由一名外科医生手术的93例结直肠癌患者:第一组32例患者在三级医疗中心(N.I. Pirogov国家医疗和外科中心)手术,第二组61例患者在地区小容量医院(Centrosoyuz医院)手术。研究的终点是短期结果:手术时间、出血量、术后住院时间、手术内和术后并发症、淋巴结收获和标本质量。两组手术时间和出血量相似(258 min vs 240 min, p = 0.47, 100 ml和100 ml, p = 0.89)。第一组患者术后住院时间明显缩短(9天vs 16天,p12分别为71.9% vs 78.7%, p = 0.485)。如果由一位经验丰富的外科医生进行手术干预,但与术后并发症的发生率和住院时间有关,则医院容量不会影响直肠癌标本质量、手术时间和出血量。