[Place of implantology in the treatment plan: apropos of some clinical situations].

Les Cahiers de prothese Pub Date : 1990-09-01
T Nguyen, C Bouniol, Y Samama
{"title":"[Place of implantology in the treatment plan: apropos of some clinical situations].","authors":"T Nguyen,&nbsp;C Bouniol,&nbsp;Y Samama","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The advent of osseointegrated implants has considerably influenced the treatment of the edentulism. The Brånemark's protocol allows a high enough degree of predictability for a wide variety of clinical applications. A selection of the most typical indications attempts to focus on the benefit of implant supported prosthesis, regarding the conventional prosthetic treatment. The relative indications concern single-tooth replacement and Kennedy class III situations where classical tooth supported bridge is not easily feasible. The resort to osseointegration treatment enhances the possibilities of prosthetic rehabilitation in unfavorable conditions. The greater part of the indications is represented by Kennedy class I and class II situations. Clinical examples selected show the different combinations related to the fixtures position in the maxilla where bone availability is reduced. When just one fixture can be installed, connection with adjacent tooth must be carefully indicated. With two fixtures, a bridge must be designed with a posterior cantilever. But the opposite dentition can also dictate a fixture installation in the posterior region for a good occlusal stabilization: a specific modality of fixture installation in the pterygoid region has provided a seductive alternative. The last part concerns the prosthetic rehabilitation of advanced cases involving evolutive periodontal disease. The current trends determine a flexible approach with strategic extractions and progressive fixtures installation during stabilized periods of the disease activity. This management of the treatment planning reduces the psychogenic stress related to the complete edentulism and allows a easier transition from partial implant supported-prosthesis to fully bone anchored-prosthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":76114,"journal":{"name":"Les Cahiers de prothese","volume":" 71","pages":"152-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Les Cahiers de prothese","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advent of osseointegrated implants has considerably influenced the treatment of the edentulism. The Brånemark's protocol allows a high enough degree of predictability for a wide variety of clinical applications. A selection of the most typical indications attempts to focus on the benefit of implant supported prosthesis, regarding the conventional prosthetic treatment. The relative indications concern single-tooth replacement and Kennedy class III situations where classical tooth supported bridge is not easily feasible. The resort to osseointegration treatment enhances the possibilities of prosthetic rehabilitation in unfavorable conditions. The greater part of the indications is represented by Kennedy class I and class II situations. Clinical examples selected show the different combinations related to the fixtures position in the maxilla where bone availability is reduced. When just one fixture can be installed, connection with adjacent tooth must be carefully indicated. With two fixtures, a bridge must be designed with a posterior cantilever. But the opposite dentition can also dictate a fixture installation in the posterior region for a good occlusal stabilization: a specific modality of fixture installation in the pterygoid region has provided a seductive alternative. The last part concerns the prosthetic rehabilitation of advanced cases involving evolutive periodontal disease. The current trends determine a flexible approach with strategic extractions and progressive fixtures installation during stabilized periods of the disease activity. This management of the treatment planning reduces the psychogenic stress related to the complete edentulism and allows a easier transition from partial implant supported-prosthesis to fully bone anchored-prosthesis.

【种植体在治疗方案中的位置:适合某些临床情况】。
骨整合种植体的出现对全牙缺牙的治疗产生了很大的影响。bramatnemark的方案为各种临床应用提供了足够高的可预测性。选择最典型的适应症试图集中在种植体支持假体的好处,关于传统的假体治疗。相对适应症涉及单牙替代和Kennedy III类情况,在这些情况下,传统的牙支撑桥不容易实现。在不利的条件下,采用骨整合治疗增加了假肢康复的可能性。大部分的指征是肯尼迪I类和II类情况。所选的临床实例显示了不同的组合与固定装置在颌骨的位置有关,其中骨可用性降低。当只能安装一个固定装置时,必须仔细指示与相邻牙齿的连接。有两个固定装置的桥梁必须设计后悬臂。但是相反的牙列也可以决定在后牙区安装固定装置以获得良好的咬合稳定:在翼状骨区安装固定装置的特定方式提供了一个诱人的选择。最后一部分是关于进展性牙周病晚期病例的假体康复。目前的趋势决定了一种灵活的方法,即在疾病活动的稳定时期进行战略性提取和渐进式固定装置安装。这种治疗计划的管理减少了与全牙义齿相关的心理压力,并允许从部分种植体支持的假体更容易过渡到完全骨锚定的假体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信