A Taxonomy Refining the Security Requirements for Electronic Voting: Analyzing Helios as a Proof of Concept

L. Langer, Axel Schmidt, J. Buchmann, M. Volkamer
{"title":"A Taxonomy Refining the Security Requirements for Electronic Voting: Analyzing Helios as a Proof of Concept","authors":"L. Langer, Axel Schmidt, J. Buchmann, M. Volkamer","doi":"10.1109/ARES.2010.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past years an approved set of security requirements for electronic voting has been established. However, there is no consistent perception of the exact content and scope of these requirements. Therefore, the corner stone for a comprehensive taxonomy refining the security requirements for electronic voting was laid in [1]. In order to verify the validity of this taxonomy, we apply it to the voting schemes Helios 1.0 and 2.0. We provide amendments to the original taxonomy and demonstrate that it successfully distinguishes between different, but related voting schemes, thus supporting its relevance for the study of electronic voting systems.","PeriodicalId":360339,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2010.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Over the past years an approved set of security requirements for electronic voting has been established. However, there is no consistent perception of the exact content and scope of these requirements. Therefore, the corner stone for a comprehensive taxonomy refining the security requirements for electronic voting was laid in [1]. In order to verify the validity of this taxonomy, we apply it to the voting schemes Helios 1.0 and 2.0. We provide amendments to the original taxonomy and demonstrate that it successfully distinguishes between different, but related voting schemes, thus supporting its relevance for the study of electronic voting systems.
细化电子投票安全需求的分类法:分析Helios作为概念证明
在过去几年中,已经建立了一套经批准的电子投票安全要求。但是,对这些要求的确切内容和范围没有一致的认识。因此,[1]为完善电子投票安全需求的综合分类法奠定了基础。为了验证该分类法的有效性,我们将其应用于投票方案Helios 1.0和2.0。我们提供了对原始分类法的修正,并证明它成功地区分了不同但相关的投票方案,从而支持其与电子投票系统研究的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信