Socio-cultural Differences in Understanding and Development of Corporate Social Responsibility in Germany and Croatia

P. Bögel, I. Lovrić, Sigrid Bekmeier-Feuerhahn, C. Sippel
{"title":"Socio-cultural Differences in Understanding and Development of Corporate Social Responsibility in Germany and Croatia","authors":"P. Bögel, I. Lovrić, Sigrid Bekmeier-Feuerhahn, C. Sippel","doi":"10.1108/S2043-905920180000012008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nPurpose \nRecently, authors have determined varieties in the development of corporate social responsibility (CSR) within Europe. This chapter examines similarities and differences in sustainability and related CSR developments in two contrasting European countries, namely Germany (industrialized society) and Croatia (transitional society). It has been argued that sustainable development is an industrial phenomenon common among Western European countries and the USA, often marked as post-industrial societies, and usually not observed in post-socialist and transitional societies which are confronted with an inner need for economic, political, and overall (re)structuring. Concerning differences within Europe, the concept of sustainable development in general and CSR concepts, in particular, have been described in the literature as less advanced in Eastern European countries than in Western European countries. Taking into account socio-cultural influences on the way CSR is understood and practiced, this study discusses this assumption and also addresses the question whether CSR is differently developed and not implicitly less developed. \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \nAs an illustrative example, a small empirical study was conducted to examine whether consumers in Croatia are actually less prepared for CSR, and, on the other hand, whether they just focus on different dimensions of CSR than consumers in Germany. In more detail, it examined differences in participants’ attitudes, social norms, and perceived level of control with regard to sustainable fashion consumption between German and Croatian consumers. \n \n \nFindings \nThe study’s findings support the assumption of previous studies that consumers’ lack of interest in CSR and knowledge deficits in this regard are likely to be a barrier for CSR development in Croatia. Yet, it also illustrates that the CSR development in Eastern European countries should not automatically be seen as less advanced but in some parts just as different. Findings from the study on differences with regard to the importance of different sustainability dimensions, namely the social and environmental dimension of CSR, support the assumption that the way CSR is understood and practiced differs due to socio-cultural differences. \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \nAs the understanding and development of CSR seem to depend on the socio-cultural context, further research is needed to examine which concepts are present in Croatia concerning sustainability and CSR. \n \n \nPractical implications \nThe findings provide information on the current status of CSR development and sustainable development in two differently governed nations of the EU, namely Germany and Croatia. Resulting practical implications for CSR strategies of companies and interventions to support CSR development and sustainable consumption patterns in both countries are discussed. \n \n \nOriginality/value \nComparative CSR studies, especially within Europe, are in general rare and in particular, this study is one of a so far very limited number of studies on CSR in Eastern Europe.","PeriodicalId":155807,"journal":{"name":"The Critical State of Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Critical State of Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-905920180000012008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Recently, authors have determined varieties in the development of corporate social responsibility (CSR) within Europe. This chapter examines similarities and differences in sustainability and related CSR developments in two contrasting European countries, namely Germany (industrialized society) and Croatia (transitional society). It has been argued that sustainable development is an industrial phenomenon common among Western European countries and the USA, often marked as post-industrial societies, and usually not observed in post-socialist and transitional societies which are confronted with an inner need for economic, political, and overall (re)structuring. Concerning differences within Europe, the concept of sustainable development in general and CSR concepts, in particular, have been described in the literature as less advanced in Eastern European countries than in Western European countries. Taking into account socio-cultural influences on the way CSR is understood and practiced, this study discusses this assumption and also addresses the question whether CSR is differently developed and not implicitly less developed. Design/methodology/approach As an illustrative example, a small empirical study was conducted to examine whether consumers in Croatia are actually less prepared for CSR, and, on the other hand, whether they just focus on different dimensions of CSR than consumers in Germany. In more detail, it examined differences in participants’ attitudes, social norms, and perceived level of control with regard to sustainable fashion consumption between German and Croatian consumers. Findings The study’s findings support the assumption of previous studies that consumers’ lack of interest in CSR and knowledge deficits in this regard are likely to be a barrier for CSR development in Croatia. Yet, it also illustrates that the CSR development in Eastern European countries should not automatically be seen as less advanced but in some parts just as different. Findings from the study on differences with regard to the importance of different sustainability dimensions, namely the social and environmental dimension of CSR, support the assumption that the way CSR is understood and practiced differs due to socio-cultural differences. Research limitations/implications As the understanding and development of CSR seem to depend on the socio-cultural context, further research is needed to examine which concepts are present in Croatia concerning sustainability and CSR. Practical implications The findings provide information on the current status of CSR development and sustainable development in two differently governed nations of the EU, namely Germany and Croatia. Resulting practical implications for CSR strategies of companies and interventions to support CSR development and sustainable consumption patterns in both countries are discussed. Originality/value Comparative CSR studies, especially within Europe, are in general rare and in particular, this study is one of a so far very limited number of studies on CSR in Eastern Europe.
德国和克罗地亚企业社会责任理解和发展的社会文化差异
摘要目的最近,作者确定了欧洲企业社会责任(CSR)发展的品种。本章考察了两个对比鲜明的欧洲国家,即德国(工业化社会)和克罗地亚(转型社会)在可持续性和相关企业社会责任发展方面的异同。有人认为,可持续发展是西欧国家和美国普遍存在的一种工业现象,通常被标记为后工业社会,而在后社会主义和转型社会中通常没有观察到,这些社会面临着经济、政治和整体(重新)结构的内在需求。关于欧洲内部的差异,文献中认为东欧国家的一般可持续发展概念,特别是企业社会责任概念不如西欧国家先进。考虑到社会文化对企业社会责任理解和实践方式的影响,本研究讨论了这一假设,并解决了企业社会责任是否有不同的发展,而不是隐含的欠发达的问题。作为一个说明性的例子,我们进行了一项小型实证研究,以检验克罗地亚的消费者是否实际上对企业社会责任的准备不足,另一方面,他们是否只是关注与德国消费者不同的企业社会责任维度。更详细地说,它研究了德国和克罗地亚消费者之间关于可持续时尚消费的参与者态度、社会规范和感知控制水平的差异。该研究的发现支持了先前研究的假设,即消费者对企业社会责任缺乏兴趣,这方面的知识不足可能成为克罗地亚企业社会责任发展的障碍。然而,这也说明,东欧国家的企业社会责任发展不应自动被视为落后,而是在某些方面同样不同。关于不同可持续性维度(即企业社会责任的社会和环境维度)的重要性差异的研究结果支持这样的假设,即社会文化差异导致企业社会责任的理解和实践方式不同。由于对企业社会责任的理解和发展似乎取决于社会文化背景,因此需要进一步研究克罗地亚目前关于可持续性和企业社会责任的哪些概念。该研究结果提供了关于欧盟两个不同治理国家(即德国和克罗地亚)CSR发展和可持续发展现状的信息。本文讨论了两国企业社会责任战略的实际意义,以及支持企业社会责任发展和可持续消费模式的干预措施。独创性/价值企业社会责任的比较研究,特别是在欧洲,通常是罕见的,特别是,这项研究是迄今为止在东欧非常有限的企业社会责任研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信