Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: Role, safety, and efficacy? Our experience of 64 cases

Rajkumar Sankaran, P. Raju, Akbar Syed, Anirudh Rajkumar, Hema Tadimari, A. Kothari
{"title":"Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: Role, safety, and efficacy? Our experience of 64 cases","authors":"Rajkumar Sankaran, P. Raju, Akbar Syed, Anirudh Rajkumar, Hema Tadimari, A. Kothari","doi":"10.4103/SJL.SJL_5_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context and Aim: Biliary tract obstruction can be bypassed endoscopically or by laparoscopic bypass. This article aims at analyzing the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy (LCDD) performed in a single hospital, in patients not amenable to endoscopic drainage, and compares outcomes from three other case series. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data. Materials and Methods: From April 2005 to March 2015, 64 patients with biliary stones and inflammatory or postpancreatitis strictures, refractory to endoscopy, underwent LCDD. The operation was performed using five ports technique. The calculi were first extracted through a vertical supraduodenal choledochotomy, followed by a confirmatory choledochoscopy. The biliary bypass was then constructed with a 2.5-cm choledochoduodenal anastomosis using a double-needle holder technique, single-layer interrupted sutures using 3.0 PDS, or Vicryl. Results: A total of 64 patients underwent LCDD. Nine of these had chronic pancreatitis; the rest had choledocholithiasis with distal stricture. In total, 33 were women and 24 were men, with mean age of 42 years. Mean operative time was 95.9 min, mean blood loss was 160 ml, and mean postoperative length of stay was 4.5 days. There was one minor leak that was managed conservatively. There was no mortality. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 11 years. On a mean follow-up of 58.2 months, there were no long-term complications such as recurrent stones, cholangitis, or sump syndrome. Conclusion: LCDD is an effective method of providing biliary bypass in well-selected patients, with uncommon short- and long-term complications.","PeriodicalId":388688,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Laparoscopy","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Laparoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/SJL.SJL_5_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Context and Aim: Biliary tract obstruction can be bypassed endoscopically or by laparoscopic bypass. This article aims at analyzing the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy (LCDD) performed in a single hospital, in patients not amenable to endoscopic drainage, and compares outcomes from three other case series. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data. Materials and Methods: From April 2005 to March 2015, 64 patients with biliary stones and inflammatory or postpancreatitis strictures, refractory to endoscopy, underwent LCDD. The operation was performed using five ports technique. The calculi were first extracted through a vertical supraduodenal choledochotomy, followed by a confirmatory choledochoscopy. The biliary bypass was then constructed with a 2.5-cm choledochoduodenal anastomosis using a double-needle holder technique, single-layer interrupted sutures using 3.0 PDS, or Vicryl. Results: A total of 64 patients underwent LCDD. Nine of these had chronic pancreatitis; the rest had choledocholithiasis with distal stricture. In total, 33 were women and 24 were men, with mean age of 42 years. Mean operative time was 95.9 min, mean blood loss was 160 ml, and mean postoperative length of stay was 4.5 days. There was one minor leak that was managed conservatively. There was no mortality. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 11 years. On a mean follow-up of 58.2 months, there were no long-term complications such as recurrent stones, cholangitis, or sump syndrome. Conclusion: LCDD is an effective method of providing biliary bypass in well-selected patients, with uncommon short- and long-term complications.
腹腔镜胆总管十二指肠吻合术:作用、安全性和有效性?我们有64个案例的经验
背景和目的:胆道梗阻可经内镜或腹腔镜旁路治疗。本文旨在分析在一家医院对不适合内镜引流的患者行腹腔镜胆总管十二指肠吻合术(LCDD)的围手术期结果,并比较其他三个病例系列的结果。这是对前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。材料与方法:2005年4月至2015年3月,64例胆结石合并炎性或胰腺炎后狭窄,内窥镜难治性患者行LCDD。手术采用五口技术。首先通过垂直十二指肠上胆道切开术取出结石,然后进行确认性胆道镜检查。采用双针夹技术,3.0 PDS或Vicryl进行单层间断缝合,构建2.5 cm胆总管十二指肠吻合术。结果:64例患者行LCDD。其中9人患有慢性胰腺炎;其余为胆总管结石伴远端狭窄。其中女性33人,男性24人,平均年龄42岁。平均手术时间95.9 min,平均失血量160 ml,平均住院时间4.5 d。有一个小漏洞处理得很保守。没有死亡。随访时间为1至11年。在平均58.2个月的随访中,没有出现长期并发症,如复发性结石、胆管炎或池综合征。结论:LCDD是一种有效的胆道旁路治疗方法,短期和长期并发症罕见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信