Territoriality and the European infrastructure system

via
{"title":"Territoriality and the European infrastructure system","authors":"via","doi":"10.4337/9781839105487.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The territorial state is at the core of the international system, with each state seeking to assert its territoriality (through a set of enabling strategies) over the portion of the earth’s surface that is recognised by all other states as being under its jurisdiction (Taylor 1994, 1995). Central to these territorial strategies is the provision of territorially extensive economic infrastructures (see below for formal definition) with sufficient capacity and development to enable the intense and prompt flow of both state and non-state tangible and non-tangible resources to enable the state to control, integrate, secure and develop that territory under its jurisdiction (Turner 2018, 2020). This underlines that the state needs to offer universal access to the infrastructure system as a means of enabling its territoriality. These territorial strategies have been subject to the adaptive tensions formed by economic, social and technological change. One such adaptive tension was and is the trend towards regionalism within the international system, where regionalism is defined as the formal and informal processes of economic, social and political interaction, interdependence and even integration across and between contiguous and semi-contiguous territorial states (Dehousse et al. 1990, Söderbaum 2012).1 This chapter explores the form and nature of the adaptive tension of regionalism on the territorial state largely within the context of the pressures this places on national infrastructure systems (NIS). In particular, the chapter will focus on the exemplar of this trend provided by the ongoing processes of European integration and how this is creating adaptive tensions promoting the re-infrastructuring of NIS as a response to these forces of change. In so doing, the focus is upon contemporary events and processes, not upon the history of regionalism and regional infrastructuring across Europe.2 Initially the chapter explores the form","PeriodicalId":287800,"journal":{"name":"Integrating Europe’s Infrastructure Networks","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrating Europe’s Infrastructure Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839105487.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The territorial state is at the core of the international system, with each state seeking to assert its territoriality (through a set of enabling strategies) over the portion of the earth’s surface that is recognised by all other states as being under its jurisdiction (Taylor 1994, 1995). Central to these territorial strategies is the provision of territorially extensive economic infrastructures (see below for formal definition) with sufficient capacity and development to enable the intense and prompt flow of both state and non-state tangible and non-tangible resources to enable the state to control, integrate, secure and develop that territory under its jurisdiction (Turner 2018, 2020). This underlines that the state needs to offer universal access to the infrastructure system as a means of enabling its territoriality. These territorial strategies have been subject to the adaptive tensions formed by economic, social and technological change. One such adaptive tension was and is the trend towards regionalism within the international system, where regionalism is defined as the formal and informal processes of economic, social and political interaction, interdependence and even integration across and between contiguous and semi-contiguous territorial states (Dehousse et al. 1990, Söderbaum 2012).1 This chapter explores the form and nature of the adaptive tension of regionalism on the territorial state largely within the context of the pressures this places on national infrastructure systems (NIS). In particular, the chapter will focus on the exemplar of this trend provided by the ongoing processes of European integration and how this is creating adaptive tensions promoting the re-infrastructuring of NIS as a response to these forces of change. In so doing, the focus is upon contemporary events and processes, not upon the history of regionalism and regional infrastructuring across Europe.2 Initially the chapter explores the form
领土和欧洲基础设施体系
领土国家是国际体系的核心,每个国家都寻求在被所有其他国家承认在其管辖范围内的地球表面部分维护其领土(通过一套使能战略)(Taylor 1994,1995)。这些领土战略的核心是提供具有足够能力和发展的领土广泛的经济基础设施(见下文正式定义),以实现国家和非国家有形和无形资源的密集和迅速流动,使国家能够控制、整合、保护和发展其管辖范围内的领土(Turner 2018, 2020)。这突显出,国家需要提供基础设施系统的普遍接入,作为实现其领土主权的一种手段。这些领土战略受制于经济、社会和技术变革所形成的适应性紧张关系。其中一种适应性紧张是国际体系中区域主义的趋势,其中区域主义被定义为相邻和半相邻领土国家之间的经济、社会和政治互动、相互依存甚至一体化的正式和非正式过程(Dehousse et al. 1990, Söderbaum 2012)本章主要在国家基础设施系统(NIS)面临压力的背景下,探讨地域主义对领土国家的适应性紧张的形式和性质。特别是,本章将重点关注欧洲一体化进程提供的这一趋势的范例,以及这是如何创造适应性紧张局势,促进NIS的基础设施重建,作为对这些变革力量的回应。在这样做的过程中,重点是当代事件和进程,而不是整个欧洲地区主义和区域基础设施的历史。2本章首先探讨了形式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信