{"title":"Electrical conductivity of the Great Lakes","authors":"L. Doherty","doi":"10.6028/JRES.067D.078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A cri tical exa mination has bcen made of the electrical co ndu ct ivity valu es ass igned, for radio propagation purposes, to t he waters of the Great Lakes. Discrepa ncies between co nductivi ty values measured in t he laboratory and t hose deduced from fi eld s t rength measurements are shown to have been t he resul t of both expenmental error and the use of faul ty standard t heoretical fi eld strength cmves. The latter source of errol' is the result of e rror in thc standard curves t hemselves and lll t he usc of a d lelectn c cons tant of 15 for overwater propagation. Condu ctivi ty valu es derived frOl.n laboratory m easuremen ts of water sa mples are sign ifi ca ntly d ifferent from those published In co nd uc!,lvlty maps. Lal:ge seasonal var iat ions in conductivity, approac hi ng a factor of two 11l some cases, a rc a slgnlfi cant complicating fac tor.","PeriodicalId":398550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section D: Radio Propagation","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1963-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section D: Radio Propagation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/JRES.067D.078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
A cri tical exa mination has bcen made of the electrical co ndu ct ivity valu es ass igned, for radio propagation purposes, to t he waters of the Great Lakes. Discrepa ncies between co nductivi ty values measured in t he laboratory and t hose deduced from fi eld s t rength measurements are shown to have been t he resul t of both expenmental error and the use of faul ty standard t heoretical fi eld strength cmves. The latter source of errol' is the result of e rror in thc standard curves t hemselves and lll t he usc of a d lelectn c cons tant of 15 for overwater propagation. Condu ctivi ty valu es derived frOl.n laboratory m easuremen ts of water sa mples are sign ifi ca ntly d ifferent from those published In co nd uc!,lvlty maps. Lal:ge seasonal var iat ions in conductivity, approac hi ng a factor of two 11l some cases, a rc a slgnlfi cant complicating fac tor.