A Comprehensive Investigation of Universal Verification Methodology (UVM) Standard for Design Verification

Shumaila Qamar, Wasi Haider Butt, Muhammad Waseem Anwar, F. Azam, Muhammad Qasim Khan
{"title":"A Comprehensive Investigation of Universal Verification Methodology (UVM) Standard for Design Verification","authors":"Shumaila Qamar, Wasi Haider Butt, Muhammad Waseem Anwar, F. Azam, Muhammad Qasim Khan","doi":"10.1145/3384544.3384547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Universal Verification Methodology (UVM) is getting attention of researchers and functional verification community due to its advance flexibility, reusability and reliability features for design verification of multifaceted embedded systems. This is the reason that different tool vendors like Mentor Graphics support UVM-based simulation for design verification. Similarly, researchers frequently explore / utilize UVM to enhance the verification capabilities for embedded systems. In this context, there is a strong need to summarize the latest advancements, tools and techniques for UVM standard. Therefore, this article performs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to identify 27 studies (i.e. 2017-2019) pertaining to UVM standard. Subsequently, 21 UVM-based frameworks and 9 tools are identified. Moreover, key benefits of UVM standard are investigated. Finally, a comparative analysis of UVM with OVM (Open Verification Methodology) is performed. It is concluded that UVM provides advanced phasing mechanism, reporting, callbacks, objections, sequence libraries and control over simulation as compared to OVM. Researchers and practitioners of domain can highly benefit from findings of this article.","PeriodicalId":200246,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3384544.3384547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Universal Verification Methodology (UVM) is getting attention of researchers and functional verification community due to its advance flexibility, reusability and reliability features for design verification of multifaceted embedded systems. This is the reason that different tool vendors like Mentor Graphics support UVM-based simulation for design verification. Similarly, researchers frequently explore / utilize UVM to enhance the verification capabilities for embedded systems. In this context, there is a strong need to summarize the latest advancements, tools and techniques for UVM standard. Therefore, this article performs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to identify 27 studies (i.e. 2017-2019) pertaining to UVM standard. Subsequently, 21 UVM-based frameworks and 9 tools are identified. Moreover, key benefits of UVM standard are investigated. Finally, a comparative analysis of UVM with OVM (Open Verification Methodology) is performed. It is concluded that UVM provides advanced phasing mechanism, reporting, callbacks, objections, sequence libraries and control over simulation as compared to OVM. Researchers and practitioners of domain can highly benefit from findings of this article.
设计验证通用验证方法(UVM)标准的综合研究
通用验证方法(Universal Verification Methodology, UVM)因其在多面嵌入式系统设计验证中具有较高的灵活性、可重用性和可靠性等特点,正受到功能验证界和研究人员的关注。这就是为什么不同的工具供应商(如Mentor Graphics)支持基于uvm的仿真来进行设计验证。同样,研究人员经常探索/利用UVM来增强嵌入式系统的验证能力。在此背景下,有必要总结UVM标准的最新进展、工具和技术。因此,本文进行了系统文献综述(SLR),以确定27项研究(即2017-2019)与UVM标准有关。随后,确定了21个基于uvm的框架和9个工具。此外,还研究了UVM标准的主要优点。最后,对UVM和OVM(开放验证方法)进行了比较分析。与OVM相比,UVM提供了先进的相位机制、报告、回调、异议、序列库和仿真控制。领域的研究人员和实践者可以从本文的发现中受益匪浅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信