An imperial community: difference and inclusionary approaches to Russianness in the State Duma, 1906–1907

Ivan Sablin
{"title":"An imperial community: difference and inclusionary approaches to Russianness in the State Duma, 1906–1907","authors":"Ivan Sablin","doi":"10.1080/13507486.2022.2074821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Focusing on the debates in the First and Second State Duma of the Russian Empire, the article argues that the imperial parliament was the site for articulating and developing multiple approaches to political community. Together with the better studied particularistic discourses, which were based on ethno-national, religious, regional, social estate, class and other differences, many deputies of the State Duma, including those who subscribed to particularistic agendas, appealed to an inclusionary Russian political community. The production of this new, modern political community was part of the global trend of political modernization but often departed from the homogenizing and exclusionary logic of nation-building. It relied on the experience of the composite imperial space, with its fluid and overlapping social categories. Two approaches predominated. The integrative approach foregrounded civil equality. It resembled other cases of modern nation-building but still remained attentive to diversity. The composite approach synthesized particularistic discourses with the broadly circulating ideas of autonomy and federation and, relying on the imperial politics of difference, imagined individual groups as the building blocks of a new differentiated political community. Both approaches stressed loyalty to the Russian state but borrowed from aspirational patriotism, seeking to rebuild it on new principles.","PeriodicalId":151994,"journal":{"name":"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2022.2074821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Focusing on the debates in the First and Second State Duma of the Russian Empire, the article argues that the imperial parliament was the site for articulating and developing multiple approaches to political community. Together with the better studied particularistic discourses, which were based on ethno-national, religious, regional, social estate, class and other differences, many deputies of the State Duma, including those who subscribed to particularistic agendas, appealed to an inclusionary Russian political community. The production of this new, modern political community was part of the global trend of political modernization but often departed from the homogenizing and exclusionary logic of nation-building. It relied on the experience of the composite imperial space, with its fluid and overlapping social categories. Two approaches predominated. The integrative approach foregrounded civil equality. It resembled other cases of modern nation-building but still remained attentive to diversity. The composite approach synthesized particularistic discourses with the broadly circulating ideas of autonomy and federation and, relying on the imperial politics of difference, imagined individual groups as the building blocks of a new differentiated political community. Both approaches stressed loyalty to the Russian state but borrowed from aspirational patriotism, seeking to rebuild it on new principles.
帝国共同体:国家杜马对俄罗斯性的差异和包容方法,1906-1907
本文聚焦于俄罗斯帝国第一届和第二届国家杜马的辩论,认为帝国议会是表达和发展多种政治共同体方法的场所。国家杜马的许多代表,包括那些赞同特殊主义议程的代表,在对基于民族、宗教、地区、社会地位、阶级和其他差异的特殊主义话语进行更好研究的同时,呼吁具有包容性的俄罗斯政治共同体。这种新的现代政治共同体的产生是全球政治现代化趋势的一部分,但往往偏离了国家建设的同质化和排他性逻辑。它依赖于复合帝国空间的经验,具有流动和重叠的社会类别。两种方法占主导地位。综合方法强调公民平等。它类似于现代国家建设的其他案例,但仍然关注多样性。复合方法将特殊主义话语与广泛流传的自治和联邦思想综合起来,并依靠帝国的差异政治,将个体群体想象为一个新的差异化政治共同体的基石。这两种方法都强调对俄罗斯国家的忠诚,但借鉴了雄心勃勃的爱国主义,寻求在新的原则上重建俄罗斯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信