Beekeeping practices and physicochemical properties of honey produced in Lerala village, Botswana

L. Bareki
{"title":"Beekeeping practices and physicochemical properties of honey produced in Lerala village, Botswana","authors":"L. Bareki","doi":"10.37106/bojaas.2019.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to evaluate the physicochemical properties of Apis mellifera honey produced in Lerala village and to assess the beekeeping practices. Sale of honey is an important source of income for beekeepers in Lerala village. There are two types of honeybee production systems in the study area: traditional backyard beekeeping and forest honey harvesting. A total of six honey samples obtained from two sources (modern hive and forest) were analysed for physicochemical properties following standard procedures. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to assess beekeeping practices by interviewing 15 individuals who have experience in beekeeping. The  average values for moisture content, total ash, free acidity, reducing sugars, sucrose, pH, water-insoluble solids and hydroxymethylfurfural of honey samples obtained from modern hives  were 18%, 0.24%, 31 meq/kg, 56.6%, 1.88%, 4.24, 0.05 g/100g and 26.6 mg/kg, respectively. The corresponding values for honey obtained from the forest were 17.7%, 0.28%, 27.7 meq/kg, 58%, 2%, 5.18, 0.07 g/100g and 10.9 mg/kg, respectively. Honey source significantly (P≤0.05) influenced the pH, reducing sugars and sucrose contents of the honey samples while ash, free acidity, water-insoluble solids and moisture content were not significantly (P>0.05) different between the two sources of honey. The pH, sucrose and reducing sugars content of forest honey samples were significantly (P≤0.05) higher than honey obtained from modern hives. All the parameters analysed were within the limits set by the Codex Alimentarius Commission for honey. The major challenges faced by beekeepers in the study area include lack of skills and knowledge of beekeeping, weak extension services and lack of bee handling and honey processing equipment. Thus, there is a need for training of beekeepers on improved beekeeping practices and provision of inputs such as modern hives and honey handling and processing equipment to farmers.","PeriodicalId":147981,"journal":{"name":"Botswana Journal of Agriculture and Applied Sciences","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botswana Journal of Agriculture and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37106/bojaas.2019.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the physicochemical properties of Apis mellifera honey produced in Lerala village and to assess the beekeeping practices. Sale of honey is an important source of income for beekeepers in Lerala village. There are two types of honeybee production systems in the study area: traditional backyard beekeeping and forest honey harvesting. A total of six honey samples obtained from two sources (modern hive and forest) were analysed for physicochemical properties following standard procedures. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to assess beekeeping practices by interviewing 15 individuals who have experience in beekeeping. The  average values for moisture content, total ash, free acidity, reducing sugars, sucrose, pH, water-insoluble solids and hydroxymethylfurfural of honey samples obtained from modern hives  were 18%, 0.24%, 31 meq/kg, 56.6%, 1.88%, 4.24, 0.05 g/100g and 26.6 mg/kg, respectively. The corresponding values for honey obtained from the forest were 17.7%, 0.28%, 27.7 meq/kg, 58%, 2%, 5.18, 0.07 g/100g and 10.9 mg/kg, respectively. Honey source significantly (P≤0.05) influenced the pH, reducing sugars and sucrose contents of the honey samples while ash, free acidity, water-insoluble solids and moisture content were not significantly (P>0.05) different between the two sources of honey. The pH, sucrose and reducing sugars content of forest honey samples were significantly (P≤0.05) higher than honey obtained from modern hives. All the parameters analysed were within the limits set by the Codex Alimentarius Commission for honey. The major challenges faced by beekeepers in the study area include lack of skills and knowledge of beekeeping, weak extension services and lack of bee handling and honey processing equipment. Thus, there is a need for training of beekeepers on improved beekeeping practices and provision of inputs such as modern hives and honey handling and processing equipment to farmers.
博茨瓦纳Lerala村的养蜂实践和蜂蜜的理化性质
本研究对勒拉拉村生产的蜜蜂蜂蜜的理化性质进行了评价,并对养蜂方式进行了评价。蜂蜜销售是Lerala村养蜂人的重要收入来源。研究区有两种类型的蜜蜂生产系统:传统的后院养蜂和森林采蜜。从两个来源(现代蜂巢和森林)获得的总共6个蜂蜜样本按照标准程序进行了物理化学特性分析。通过采访15名有养蜂经验的人,采用半结构化问卷来评估养蜂实践。现代蜂箱蜂蜜样品的水分、总灰分、游离酸度、还原糖、蔗糖、pH、水不溶性固形物和羟甲基糠醛的平均值分别为18%、0.24%、31 meq/kg、56.6%、1.88%、4.24、0.05 g/100g和26.6 mg/kg。从森林中获得的蜂蜜相应值分别为17.7%、0.28%、27.7 meq/kg、58%、2%、5.18、0.07 g/100g和10.9 mg/kg。蜂蜜源显著(P≤0.05)影响了蜂蜜样品的pH、还原糖和蔗糖含量,而两种蜂蜜样品的灰分、游离酸度、水不溶性固形物和水分含量差异不显著(P≤0.05)。森林蜂蜜的pH、蔗糖和还原糖含量显著(P≤0.05)高于现代蜂箱蜂蜜。分析的所有参数均在食品法典委员会规定的蜂蜜限量范围内。研究地区养蜂人面临的主要挑战包括缺乏养蜂技能和知识,推广服务薄弱以及缺乏蜜蜂处理和蜂蜜加工设备。因此,有必要对养蜂人进行关于改进养蜂做法的培训,并向农民提供现代蜂箱和蜂蜜处理和加工设备等投入物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信