Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy in The Management of Neck Pain: Systematic Review

Iqra Mazhar, Muhammad Asif, Ismail Anwar Khokhar
{"title":"Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy in The Management of Neck Pain: Systematic Review","authors":"Iqra Mazhar, Muhammad Asif, Ismail Anwar Khokhar","doi":"10.55735/hjprs.v2i4.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laser therapy is an effective therapeutic option that has helped patients with both acute and chronic neuropathies. Low-level laser therapy provides effective short-term pain relief and improvement in cervical range of motion in participants with neck pain. Objective: To explore the evidence related to the efficacy of low-level laser therapy in patients with neck pain. Methods: This systematic review comprised randomized controlled trials in which pain and range of motion were the outcomes investigated. The PEDro scale was then used to assess the quality of the studies involved. Studies from Google Scholar, PubMed, the HEC Digital Library, PEDro and the Cochrane Library were included in this review. Only randomized trials and English-language papers involved people over the age of 18 with neck discomfort and both genders. The population with psychiatric illnesses and traumatic traumas who were less than 18 years old included observational studies, copyright issues and paper in other languages.26 A PRISMA flowchart was also used to demonstrate the entire process of adding and removing articles from review. Results: PEDro scale was used to assess the quality of studies as shown in Table I, showed that all the studies are of high quality. The following variables were collected for each study: general patient information such as mean age, mean duration, percentages of male and female in sample size, country of study, year of study publication, name of first author, sample size and outcome measure (Table II). Studies revealed that laser therapy is found to be statistically significant in treating neck pain, neck range of motion and disability when compared to placebo therapy. Conclusion: This study found that laser therapy decreases pain in participants with persistent neck discomfort shortly after therapy. Laser therapy is proven to be more effective than placebo therapy in relieving arm pain and improving cervical strength and flexibility in participants with severe pain and increasing the quality of life when compared to patients treated with a placebo laser therapy.","PeriodicalId":351154,"journal":{"name":"The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55735/hjprs.v2i4.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laser therapy is an effective therapeutic option that has helped patients with both acute and chronic neuropathies. Low-level laser therapy provides effective short-term pain relief and improvement in cervical range of motion in participants with neck pain. Objective: To explore the evidence related to the efficacy of low-level laser therapy in patients with neck pain. Methods: This systematic review comprised randomized controlled trials in which pain and range of motion were the outcomes investigated. The PEDro scale was then used to assess the quality of the studies involved. Studies from Google Scholar, PubMed, the HEC Digital Library, PEDro and the Cochrane Library were included in this review. Only randomized trials and English-language papers involved people over the age of 18 with neck discomfort and both genders. The population with psychiatric illnesses and traumatic traumas who were less than 18 years old included observational studies, copyright issues and paper in other languages.26 A PRISMA flowchart was also used to demonstrate the entire process of adding and removing articles from review. Results: PEDro scale was used to assess the quality of studies as shown in Table I, showed that all the studies are of high quality. The following variables were collected for each study: general patient information such as mean age, mean duration, percentages of male and female in sample size, country of study, year of study publication, name of first author, sample size and outcome measure (Table II). Studies revealed that laser therapy is found to be statistically significant in treating neck pain, neck range of motion and disability when compared to placebo therapy. Conclusion: This study found that laser therapy decreases pain in participants with persistent neck discomfort shortly after therapy. Laser therapy is proven to be more effective than placebo therapy in relieving arm pain and improving cervical strength and flexibility in participants with severe pain and increasing the quality of life when compared to patients treated with a placebo laser therapy.
低水平激光治疗颈部疼痛的疗效:系统回顾
背景:激光治疗是一种有效的治疗选择,已帮助患者急性和慢性神经病变。低水平激光治疗提供有效的短期疼痛缓解和颈部活动范围的改善与颈部疼痛的参与者。目的:探讨低水平激光治疗颈部疼痛疗效的相关证据。方法:本系统综述包括以疼痛和活动范围为研究结果的随机对照试验。然后使用PEDro量表来评估所涉及研究的质量。来自b谷歌Scholar、PubMed、HEC数字图书馆、PEDro和Cochrane图书馆的研究被纳入本综述。只有随机试验和英语论文涉及18岁以上颈部不适的男女。26 .患有精神疾病和创伤性创伤的年龄小于18岁的人口包括观察性研究、版权问题和其他语言的论文还使用了一个PRISMA流程图来演示从审查中添加和删除文章的整个过程。结果:采用PEDro量表对研究质量进行评估,结果如表1所示,表明所有研究均为高质量研究。每项研究收集了以下变量:患者的一般信息,如平均年龄、平均持续时间、男性和女性在样本量中的百分比、研究国家、研究发表年份、第一作者姓名、样本量和结果测量(表2)。研究表明,与安慰剂治疗相比,激光治疗在治疗颈部疼痛、颈部活动范围和残疾方面具有统计学意义。结论:本研究发现激光治疗可减轻治疗后颈部持续不适患者的疼痛。与安慰剂激光治疗相比,激光治疗在缓解手臂疼痛和改善严重疼痛患者的颈椎力量和灵活性方面比安慰剂治疗更有效,并提高了患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信