Evaluation of Canine Retraction Using Double Slot Vs. Single Slot Orthodontic Brackets; CBCT Study

A. Abouelnour, A. Amar, Ramadan Abushahba
{"title":"Evaluation of Canine Retraction Using Double Slot Vs. Single Slot Orthodontic Brackets; CBCT Study","authors":"A. Abouelnour, A. Amar, Ramadan Abushahba","doi":"10.21608/aadj.2022.234801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The duration of orthodontic treatment is the primary concern of almost all the patients. Therefore, this increases the demand to find the best method to increase the rate of tooth movement with the least possible disadvantages. Subjects and Methods : This prospective randomized clinical study was conducted on a total sample of 32 orthodontic patients recommended for upper first premolar extraction as part of their orthodontic treatment plan. The patient ages were ranged from (16-26) years. Patients were assigned to (Group I) single slot bracket, (Group II) double slot bracket. Results: Regarding the post-treatment value, a significantly higher mean value was recorded for Canine Vertical Tipping Angle in single slot bracket group (12.65±6.15), in comparison to double slot bracket group (7.31±2.71), (p=0.00). Canine Cusp Retraction Distance showed a non-significant higher value in double slot bracket group (p=0.30). Conclusion: Double slot bracket is very effective in canine retraction as it showed less canine vertical tipping and more bodily movement during retraction, and more apex retraction value in comparison with single slot bracket.","PeriodicalId":136230,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2022.234801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. The duration of orthodontic treatment is the primary concern of almost all the patients. Therefore, this increases the demand to find the best method to increase the rate of tooth movement with the least possible disadvantages. Subjects and Methods : This prospective randomized clinical study was conducted on a total sample of 32 orthodontic patients recommended for upper first premolar extraction as part of their orthodontic treatment plan. The patient ages were ranged from (16-26) years. Patients were assigned to (Group I) single slot bracket, (Group II) double slot bracket. Results: Regarding the post-treatment value, a significantly higher mean value was recorded for Canine Vertical Tipping Angle in single slot bracket group (12.65±6.15), in comparison to double slot bracket group (7.31±2.71), (p=0.00). Canine Cusp Retraction Distance showed a non-significant higher value in double slot bracket group (p=0.30). Conclusion: Double slot bracket is very effective in canine retraction as it showed less canine vertical tipping and more bodily movement during retraction, and more apex retraction value in comparison with single slot bracket.
双槽与单槽正畸托槽对犬齿内收的影响CBCT研究
的目标。正畸治疗的持续时间几乎是所有患者最关心的问题。因此,这增加了找到最好的方法来增加牙齿运动的速度和尽可能少的缺点的需求。对象和方法:本前瞻性随机临床研究对32例正畸患者进行了随机临床研究,这些患者被推荐作为正畸治疗计划的一部分进行上颌第一前磨牙拔牙。患者年龄16-26岁。患者被分配到(I组)单槽支架,(II组)双槽支架。结果:单槽托槽组的犬齿垂直倾斜角平均值(12.65±6.15)显著高于双槽托槽组(7.31±2.71),差异有统计学意义(p=0.00)。双槽托槽组犬牙尖回缩距离显著高于双槽托槽组(p=0.30)。结论:双槽托槽与单槽托槽相比,双槽托槽在拔牙过程中表现出更少的犬齿垂直倾倾和更多的身体运动,具有更大的尖端内收价值,是一种有效的拔牙方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信