Fear and Loathing: The Rise of Ephebiphobia and Its Implications for Youth Activism

Elizabeth W. Corrie
{"title":"Fear and Loathing: The Rise of Ephebiphobia and Its Implications for Youth Activism","authors":"Elizabeth W. Corrie","doi":"10.1108/S0163-786X20210000045003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The visibility and impact of young activists is evident in 2020 more than ever, most clearly in the Black Lives Matter movement, but also among climate strikers, water protectors, March for Our Lives organizers, and even TikTok users and K-pop music fans. The ambivalence with which adults have responded – from pride to dismissal to demonization – has its roots in implicit yet pervasive assumptions about young people stretching back to the early nineteenth century. Through a brief historical sketch, I demonstrate that the contemporary concept of the “American teenager” is the product of a series of social, economic, and political changes in the United States and that this concept undermines youth activism and gives license to adults to dismiss young peoples' justified anger at injustice. This essay contends that adultism, and specifically ephebiphobia – the fear and loathing of young people – dominates today's cultural perceptions of youth in the United States and contributes to policies in education and law enforcement that have domesticated and criminalized young people, undermining their political power. Understanding of the historical factors that shape adults' attitudes toward young peoples' capabilities as activists is a first step to improving and sustaining collaboration between youth and adults in social movements.","PeriodicalId":167211,"journal":{"name":"Four Dead in Ohio","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Four Dead in Ohio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X20210000045003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The visibility and impact of young activists is evident in 2020 more than ever, most clearly in the Black Lives Matter movement, but also among climate strikers, water protectors, March for Our Lives organizers, and even TikTok users and K-pop music fans. The ambivalence with which adults have responded – from pride to dismissal to demonization – has its roots in implicit yet pervasive assumptions about young people stretching back to the early nineteenth century. Through a brief historical sketch, I demonstrate that the contemporary concept of the “American teenager” is the product of a series of social, economic, and political changes in the United States and that this concept undermines youth activism and gives license to adults to dismiss young peoples' justified anger at injustice. This essay contends that adultism, and specifically ephebiphobia – the fear and loathing of young people – dominates today's cultural perceptions of youth in the United States and contributes to policies in education and law enforcement that have domesticated and criminalized young people, undermining their political power. Understanding of the historical factors that shape adults' attitudes toward young peoples' capabilities as activists is a first step to improving and sustaining collaboration between youth and adults in social movements.
恐惧与厌恶:嗜麻症的兴起及其对青年行动主义的影响
2020年,年轻活动人士的知名度和影响力比以往任何时候都更加明显,最明显的是“黑人的命也是命”运动,还有气候罢工者、水保护者、“为我们的生命游行”组织者,甚至是TikTok用户和韩国流行音乐粉丝。成年人对此的矛盾心理——从骄傲到不屑一顾再到妖魔化——其根源在于对年轻人的含蓄而普遍的假设,这种假设可以追溯到19世纪初。通过一个简短的历史概述,我证明了“美国青少年”的当代概念是美国一系列社会、经济和政治变化的产物,这个概念削弱了青年的激进主义,并给成年人提供了借口,让他们无视年轻人对不公正的合理愤怒。这篇文章认为,成人主义,特别是对年轻人的恐惧和厌恶,主导了当今美国对年轻人的文化观念,并促成了教育和执法政策,这些政策将年轻人驯化并定为犯罪,削弱了他们的政治权力。了解影响成年人对年轻人作为积极分子的能力的态度的历史因素,是改善和维持青年与成年人在社会运动中的合作的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信