B2C Online Pricing Practices and Potential Impact upon Firm Reputation and E-consumer Trust

Joanna Jones, E. Jones, Lyndon Murphy
{"title":"B2C Online Pricing Practices and Potential Impact upon Firm Reputation and E-consumer Trust","authors":"Joanna Jones, E. Jones, Lyndon Murphy","doi":"10.3316/IJEBM0202003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an argument that the palpable ease with which e-tailers can change menu prices on-line has lead to the emergence of irrational pricing. This paper focuses upon on-line pricing practices, their potential relationship with e-consumer trust and perceived reputation of e-tailers. Whilst online pricing practices and e-trust has been the subject of much erudite research, there has been little or no research that explicitly juxtaposes the two areas. The data is obtained from responses to questionnaires completed by business undergraduate students. The questionnaire rationale is to gather data concerning a range of on-line shopping preferences and questions posed investigate the respondents' perceptions and attitudes towards various on-line pricing practices, including price discrimination. To improve the richness of the study, follow-up semi-structured (themed) interviews have been administered. The managerial implications relating to on-line pricing practices and e-trust are rich and varied. For example, there is evidence that some on-line pricing practices, such as first degree price discrimination, can negatively impact facets of e-trust i.e. benevolence and integrity and hence, upon an organisation's reputation. Interestingly, many e-consumers, whilst believing privacy to be an important shopping factor, do not understand how organisations collect and use personal information. Additionally, negative feelings assigned to price comparison sites can be transferred to specific e-tailers listed upon the site. Conversely, organisations can enhance the consumer perception of benevolence and integrity by becoming members of cash back co-operative schemes. There is evidence that econsumers find price differences based upon product configuration and delivery to be acceptable.","PeriodicalId":250664,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of E-business Management","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of E-business Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3316/IJEBM0202003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an argument that the palpable ease with which e-tailers can change menu prices on-line has lead to the emergence of irrational pricing. This paper focuses upon on-line pricing practices, their potential relationship with e-consumer trust and perceived reputation of e-tailers. Whilst online pricing practices and e-trust has been the subject of much erudite research, there has been little or no research that explicitly juxtaposes the two areas. The data is obtained from responses to questionnaires completed by business undergraduate students. The questionnaire rationale is to gather data concerning a range of on-line shopping preferences and questions posed investigate the respondents' perceptions and attitudes towards various on-line pricing practices, including price discrimination. To improve the richness of the study, follow-up semi-structured (themed) interviews have been administered. The managerial implications relating to on-line pricing practices and e-trust are rich and varied. For example, there is evidence that some on-line pricing practices, such as first degree price discrimination, can negatively impact facets of e-trust i.e. benevolence and integrity and hence, upon an organisation's reputation. Interestingly, many e-consumers, whilst believing privacy to be an important shopping factor, do not understand how organisations collect and use personal information. Additionally, negative feelings assigned to price comparison sites can be transferred to specific e-tailers listed upon the site. Conversely, organisations can enhance the consumer perception of benevolence and integrity by becoming members of cash back co-operative schemes. There is evidence that econsumers find price differences based upon product configuration and delivery to be acceptable.
B2C在线定价实践及其对企业声誉和电子消费者信任的潜在影响
有一种观点认为,电子零售商可以轻易地在网上改变菜单价格,这导致了非理性定价的出现。本文的重点是在线定价实践,他们与电子消费者的信任和感知声誉的电子零售商的潜在关系。虽然在线定价实践和电子信任一直是许多博学研究的主题,但很少或没有研究明确地将这两个领域并列起来。数据来源于对商科学本科学生填写的问卷的回答。调查问卷的基本原理是收集有关一系列网上购物偏好的数据,所提出的问题调查受访者对各种网上定价做法的看法和态度,包括价格歧视。为了提高研究的丰富性,我们进行了半结构化(主题)访谈。与在线定价实践和电子信任有关的管理含义是丰富多样的。例如,有证据表明,一些在线定价做法,如一级价格歧视,会对电子信任(即仁慈和诚信)的各个方面产生负面影响,从而影响组织的声誉。有趣的是,许多电子消费者虽然认为隐私是一个重要的购物因素,但并不了解机构如何收集和使用个人信息。此外,对价格比较网站的负面情绪可以转移到网站上列出的特定电子零售商身上。相反,组织可以通过成为现金返还合作计划的成员来增强消费者对仁慈和诚信的看法。有证据表明,消费者认为基于产品配置和交付的价格差异是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信