Biomechanical analysis of screw configurations on plate fixation in humeral shaft fracture: A Finite element analysis

Nutnicha Naknual, A. Kwanyuang
{"title":"Biomechanical analysis of screw configurations on plate fixation in humeral shaft fracture: A Finite element analysis","authors":"Nutnicha Naknual, A. Kwanyuang","doi":"10.1109/BMEiCON53485.2021.9745254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A standard technique of humeral shaft fracture treatment is plate and screw fixation. Bicortical screws are commonly used for fixing in this procedure. However, several previous studies reported that the tip of bicortical screws could damage the surrounding radial nerve. To avoid the problem of nerve injury, this study evaluated various optimization of screw fixation configurations in the humeral shaft fracture treatment which did not penetrate to the nerve region using finite element analysis. Simplified humerus fracture models were fixed by six different configurations of various screw lengths. All models were tested virtually under axial compression, torsion, and bending conditions. The construct stability was determined by stiffness, relative displacement, and von Mises stress output parameters. The non-inserted screw at the risk area of the radial nerve injury model provided lower stability, when considered by the lowest stiffness in torsion, the highest relative displacement in torsion and bending, compared to other configurations. For the prediction of von Mises stress, the model of all unicortical screws fixation configuration provided the highest magnitude. There was not any difference of the stress occurring when replacing among bicortical, unicortical, and unicortical abutting inserted techniques at the high-risk location. These results revealed an equivalent performance when using either unicortical or unicortical abutting screw fixations at the high-risk position, which might introduce the screw fixation configurations to reduce the risk of radial nerve injury.","PeriodicalId":380002,"journal":{"name":"2021 13th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 13th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BMEiCON53485.2021.9745254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A standard technique of humeral shaft fracture treatment is plate and screw fixation. Bicortical screws are commonly used for fixing in this procedure. However, several previous studies reported that the tip of bicortical screws could damage the surrounding radial nerve. To avoid the problem of nerve injury, this study evaluated various optimization of screw fixation configurations in the humeral shaft fracture treatment which did not penetrate to the nerve region using finite element analysis. Simplified humerus fracture models were fixed by six different configurations of various screw lengths. All models were tested virtually under axial compression, torsion, and bending conditions. The construct stability was determined by stiffness, relative displacement, and von Mises stress output parameters. The non-inserted screw at the risk area of the radial nerve injury model provided lower stability, when considered by the lowest stiffness in torsion, the highest relative displacement in torsion and bending, compared to other configurations. For the prediction of von Mises stress, the model of all unicortical screws fixation configuration provided the highest magnitude. There was not any difference of the stress occurring when replacing among bicortical, unicortical, and unicortical abutting inserted techniques at the high-risk location. These results revealed an equivalent performance when using either unicortical or unicortical abutting screw fixations at the high-risk position, which might introduce the screw fixation configurations to reduce the risk of radial nerve injury.
肱骨骨干骨折钢板内固定螺钉配置的生物力学分析:有限元分析
肱骨骨干骨折治疗的标准技术是钢板螺钉固定。双皮质螺钉通常用于该手术的固定。然而,先前的一些研究报道双皮质螺钉的尖端可能损害周围的桡神经。为了避免神经损伤的问题,本研究利用有限元分析评估了未穿透神经区的肱骨骨干骨折治疗中螺钉固定配置的各种优化。简化肱骨骨折模型采用6种不同长度的不同螺钉配置进行固定。所有模型都在轴向压缩、扭转和弯曲条件下进行了虚拟测试。结构稳定性由刚度、相对位移和von Mises应力输出参数确定。与其他配置相比,桡神经损伤模型危险区域的非插入螺钉的稳定性较低,从扭转刚度最低、扭转和弯曲相对位移最高的角度考虑。对于von Mises应力的预测,所有单皮质螺钉固定配置的模型提供了最高的幅度。在高危部位,双皮质、单皮质和单皮质邻近插入技术在置换时所产生的压力无显著差异。这些结果表明,在高危部位使用单皮质或单皮质相邻螺钉固定具有相同的性能,这可能会引入螺钉固定配置来降低桡神经损伤的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信