{"title":"OWE MVTER","authors":"Diether Schürr","doi":"10.1163/18756719-12340273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nFirst, the narrator’s comments in Wolfram von Eschenbach’s ‘Parzival’ with an ironic reference to the narrator himself and/or the coupling of the fictitious locations to his native landscape are compiled and explained, within which the mention of Wildenberc belongs, as a place of writing and recitation, and to which the Grail Castle Munsalvæsche also owes its name. Then the identification with the castle near Amorbach and the question of whether it had already existed in Wolfram’s time are dealt with briefly, then extensively the two palas inscriptions and the history of their treatment and interpretation, especially regarding the doubts about their authenticity. With regard to the inscription on the right, it is argued that it does not name an architect Bertolt and a stonemason Ulrich, but first the architect, then the inexperienced writer of both inscriptions, who, with OWE MVTER, reminds us of ‘Parzival’ and its author. This short quotation refers to the structure of the plot and the subject matter of the work and thus shows that Ulrich was a connoisseur.","PeriodicalId":108095,"journal":{"name":"Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik","volume":"149 17","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18756719-12340273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
First, the narrator’s comments in Wolfram von Eschenbach’s ‘Parzival’ with an ironic reference to the narrator himself and/or the coupling of the fictitious locations to his native landscape are compiled and explained, within which the mention of Wildenberc belongs, as a place of writing and recitation, and to which the Grail Castle Munsalvæsche also owes its name. Then the identification with the castle near Amorbach and the question of whether it had already existed in Wolfram’s time are dealt with briefly, then extensively the two palas inscriptions and the history of their treatment and interpretation, especially regarding the doubts about their authenticity. With regard to the inscription on the right, it is argued that it does not name an architect Bertolt and a stonemason Ulrich, but first the architect, then the inexperienced writer of both inscriptions, who, with OWE MVTER, reminds us of ‘Parzival’ and its author. This short quotation refers to the structure of the plot and the subject matter of the work and thus shows that Ulrich was a connoisseur.
首先,叙述者在Wolfram von Eschenbach的《Parzival》中的评论讽刺了叙述者自己和/或虚构的地点与他的家乡景观的结合,被编译和解释,其中提到了Wildenberc,作为一个写作和背诵的地方,圣杯城堡Munsalvæsche也因此而得名。然后是对Amorbach附近城堡的认同以及它是否已经存在于Wolfram时代的问题,然后是对两个palas铭文及其处理和解释的历史的简要处理,特别是对其真实性的怀疑。关于右边的铭文,有人认为它不是建筑师Bertolt和石匠Ulrich的名字,而是建筑师的名字,然后是两个铭文的缺乏经验的作者,他们与OWE MVTER一起让我们想起了“Parzival”及其作者。这段简短的引言指的是情节的结构和作品的主题,从而表明乌尔里希是一个鉴赏家。