Welcome to Facts & Frictions

Patricia W. Elliott, Nicole Blanchett, Bradd K. Clark, Pascale Dangoisse, Amélie Daoust-Boisvert, Paul Fontaine, Susan Harada, A. McLean, Gabriela Perdomo, C. Waddell
{"title":"Welcome to Facts & Frictions","authors":"Patricia W. Elliott, Nicole Blanchett, Bradd K. Clark, Pascale Dangoisse, Amélie Daoust-Boisvert, Paul Fontaine, Susan Harada, A. McLean, Gabriela Perdomo, C. Waddell","doi":"10.22215/ff/v1.i1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent graduates of two Canadian journalism schools were surveyed on their attitudes toward what constitutes useful technology in journalism. Both those working in journalism and those in communications felt a wide range of innovative technologies were useful and would use them more in their jobs in an ideal world. A narrower range was used in practice. Journalism respondents favoured use of tools that could be applied to traditional tasks such as finding stories. Those in communications were more likely than journalists to perform tasks such as collecting and organizing data in a spreadsheet, although the basics of data journalism are taught in both programs. The results raise questions about the appropriate mix of technological instruction in journalism curricula.","PeriodicalId":444287,"journal":{"name":"Facts and Frictions: Emerging Debates, Pedagogies and Practices in Contemporary Journalism","volume":"173 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts and Frictions: Emerging Debates, Pedagogies and Practices in Contemporary Journalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22215/ff/v1.i1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent graduates of two Canadian journalism schools were surveyed on their attitudes toward what constitutes useful technology in journalism. Both those working in journalism and those in communications felt a wide range of innovative technologies were useful and would use them more in their jobs in an ideal world. A narrower range was used in practice. Journalism respondents favoured use of tools that could be applied to traditional tasks such as finding stories. Those in communications were more likely than journalists to perform tasks such as collecting and organizing data in a spreadsheet, although the basics of data journalism are taught in both programs. The results raise questions about the appropriate mix of technological instruction in journalism curricula.
欢迎来到《事实与摩擦》
对加拿大两所新闻学院的应届毕业生进行了调查,了解他们对新闻中有用的技术构成的态度。在一个理想的世界里,新闻工作者和通信工作者都认为各种各样的创新技术是有用的,他们会在工作中更多地使用这些技术。在实践中使用了一个较窄的范围。新闻业的受访者倾向于使用可以用于传统任务(如寻找故事)的工具。通信专业的学生比记者更有可能完成收集和组织电子表格数据等任务,尽管这两个专业都教授数据新闻的基础知识。研究结果提出了在新闻课程中适当搭配技术教学的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信